Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study
- PMID: 16230313
- PMCID: PMC1283274
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38636.499225.55
Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study
Erratum in
- BMJ. 2006 Jan 21;332(7534):151
Abstract
Objectives: To compare exposure to secondhand smoke and respiratory health in bar staff in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland before and after the introduction of legislation for smoke-free workplaces in the Republic.
Design: Comparisons before and after the legislation in intervention and control regions.
Setting: Public houses in three areas in the Republic (intervention) and one area in Northern Ireland (control).
Participants: 329 bar staff enrolled in baseline survey; 249 (76%) followed up one year later. Of these, 158 were non-smokers both at baseline and follow-up.
Main outcome measures: Salivary cotinine concentration, self reported exposure to secondhand smoke, and respiratory and sensory irritation symptoms.
Results: In bar staff in the Republic who did not themselves smoke, salivary cotinine concentrations dropped by 80% after the smoke-free law (from median 29.0 nmol/l (95% confidence interval 18.2 to 43.2 nmol/l)) to 5.1 nmol/l (2.8 to 13.1 nmol/l) in contrast with a 20% decline in Northern Ireland over the same period (from median 25.3 nmol/l (10.4 to 59.2 nmol/l) to 20.4 nmol/l (13.2 to 33.8 nmol/l)). Changes in self reported exposure to secondhand smoke were consistent with the changes in cotinine concentrations. Reporting any respiratory symptom declined significantly in the Republic (down 16.7%, -26.1% to -7.3%) but not in Northern Ireland (0% difference, -32.7% to 32.7%). After adjustment for confounding, respiratory symptoms declined significantly more in the Republic than in Northern Ireland and the decline in cotinine concentration was twice as great.
Conclusion: The smoke-free law in the Republic of Ireland protects non-smoking bar workers from exposure to secondhand smoke.
References
-
- California Environmental Protection Agency. Health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Sacramento: California Environmental Protection Agency, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 1997.
-
- Allwright S, McLaughlin JP, Murphy D, Pratt I, Ryan M, Smith A. Report on the health effects of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) in the workplace. Dublin: Health and Safety Authority/Office of Tobacco Control, 2003.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical