Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Nov 12;331(7525):1117.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38636.499225.55. Epub 2005 Oct 17.

Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study

Shane Allwright et al. BMJ. .

Erratum in

  • BMJ. 2006 Jan 21;332(7534):151

Abstract

Objectives: To compare exposure to secondhand smoke and respiratory health in bar staff in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland before and after the introduction of legislation for smoke-free workplaces in the Republic.

Design: Comparisons before and after the legislation in intervention and control regions.

Setting: Public houses in three areas in the Republic (intervention) and one area in Northern Ireland (control).

Participants: 329 bar staff enrolled in baseline survey; 249 (76%) followed up one year later. Of these, 158 were non-smokers both at baseline and follow-up.

Main outcome measures: Salivary cotinine concentration, self reported exposure to secondhand smoke, and respiratory and sensory irritation symptoms.

Results: In bar staff in the Republic who did not themselves smoke, salivary cotinine concentrations dropped by 80% after the smoke-free law (from median 29.0 nmol/l (95% confidence interval 18.2 to 43.2 nmol/l)) to 5.1 nmol/l (2.8 to 13.1 nmol/l) in contrast with a 20% decline in Northern Ireland over the same period (from median 25.3 nmol/l (10.4 to 59.2 nmol/l) to 20.4 nmol/l (13.2 to 33.8 nmol/l)). Changes in self reported exposure to secondhand smoke were consistent with the changes in cotinine concentrations. Reporting any respiratory symptom declined significantly in the Republic (down 16.7%, -26.1% to -7.3%) but not in Northern Ireland (0% difference, -32.7% to 32.7%). After adjustment for confounding, respiratory symptoms declined significantly more in the Republic than in Northern Ireland and the decline in cotinine concentration was twice as great.

Conclusion: The smoke-free law in the Republic of Ireland protects non-smoking bar workers from exposure to secondhand smoke.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. Lyon: IARC Press, 2004. - PMC - PubMed
    1. California Environmental Protection Agency. Health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Sacramento: California Environmental Protection Agency, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 1997.
    1. Allwright S, McLaughlin JP, Murphy D, Pratt I, Ryan M, Smith A. Report on the health effects of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) in the workplace. Dublin: Health and Safety Authority/Office of Tobacco Control, 2003.
    1. Howell F. Ireland's workplaces, going smoke free. BMJ 2004;328: 847-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allwright SPA. Republic of Ireland's indoor workplace smoking ban. Br J Gen Pract 2004;54: 811-2. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms