Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2005 Oct;140(10):986-92.
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.10.986.

Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies

Gennaro Nuzzo  1 , Felice Giuliante, Ivo Giovannini, Francesco Ardito, Fabrizio D'Acapito, Maria Vellone, Marino Murazio, Giovanni Capelli
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies

Gennaro Nuzzo et al. Arch Surg. 2005 Oct.

Abstract

Hypothesis: Bile duct injury (BDI) remains the most serious complication of cholecystectomy. With laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the incidence has become more frequent. This study verifies the current incidence, mechanism, presentation, and treatment of BDI occurring during LC in general surgical practice.

Design: Anonymous retrospective multicenter survey.

Setting: Department of surgery at a university referral center, collecting data from general surgical units.

Patients: Data from 56 591 patients who underwent LC between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2000, in 184 hospitals in Italy were analyzed.

Main outcome measures: Current incidence, mechanism, presentation, and treatment of BDI occurring during LC in general surgical practice.

Results: Two hundred thirty-five BDIs were reported, with an overall incidence of 0.42%. There were no risk factors in 80.0% of the patients. Poor identification of the anatomical features of the hepatic pedicle was the most frequently reported cause (36.8%), and technical problems accounted for 27.0% of causes. The incidence of BDI was higher during cholecystitis (P<.001) and decreased with increasing number of LCs performed by the surgical teams (P<.01). There was no difference in incidence according to technique (French or US) or to routine or selective intraoperative cholangiography. One hundred eight BDIs (46.0%) were recognized intraoperatively and immediately repaired in 89.8% of patients. One hundred twenty-seven BDIs (54.0%) were diagnosed postoperatively, the dominant manifestation being biliary fistula (44.1%).

Conclusions: This study confirms a higher incidence of BDI during LC. It highlights the relevance of the number of previously performed LCs and of the correct surgical technique to avoid BDI. The need for correct procedures, adequate expertise of the repairing surgeon in BDI repairs, and a multidisciplinary approach in the management of BDI is emphasized.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types