Effect of a second-generation venous catheter impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine on central catheter-related infections: a randomized, controlled trial
- PMID: 16230723
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-8-200510180-00007
Effect of a second-generation venous catheter impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine on central catheter-related infections: a randomized, controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Central venous catheter-related infections are a significant medical problem. Improved preventive measures are needed.
Objective: To ascertain 1) effectiveness of a second-generation antiseptic-coated catheter in the prevention of microbial colonization and infection; 2) safety and tolerability of this device; 3) microbiology of infected catheters; and 4) propensity for the development of antiseptic resistance.
Design: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.
Setting: 9 university-affiliated medical centers.
Patients: 780 patients in intensive care units who required central venous catheterization.
Intervention: Patients received either a standard catheter or a catheter coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine.
Measurements: The authors assessed catheter colonization and catheter-related infection, characterized microbes by molecular typing, and determined their susceptibility to antiseptics. Patient tolerance of the catheter was monitored.
Results: Patients with the 2 types of catheters had similar demographic features, clinical interventions, laboratory values, and risk factors for infection. Antiseptic catheters were less likely to be colonized at the time of removal compared with control catheters (13.3 vs. 24.1 colonized catheters per 1000 catheter-days; P < 0.01). The center-stratified Cox regression hazard ratio for colonization controlling for sampling design and potentially confounding variables was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.78). The rate of definitive catheter-related bloodstream infection was 1.24 per 1000 catheter-days (CI, 0.26 to 3.62 per 1000 catheter-days) for the control group versus 0.42 per 1000 catheter-days (CI, 0.01 to 2.34 per 1000 catheter-days) for the antiseptic catheter group (P = 0.6). Coagulase-negative staphylococci and other gram-positive organisms were the most frequent microbes to colonize catheters. Noninfectious adverse events were similar in both groups. Antiseptic susceptibility was similar for microbes recovered from either group.
Limitations: The antiseptic catheter was not compared with an antibiotic-coated catheter, and no conclusion can be made regarding its effect on bloodstream infection.
Conclusions: The second-generation chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine catheter is well tolerated. Antiseptic coating appears to reduce microbial colonization of the catheter compared with an uncoated catheter.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Can antibiotic-coated catheters help decrease the incidence of bloodstream infections in patients in the intensive care unit?Ann Intern Med. 2005 Oct 18;143(8):I36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-8-200510180-00003. Ann Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 16230719 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter. A randomized, controlled trial.Ann Intern Med. 1997 Aug 15;127(4):257-66. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-4-199708150-00001. Ann Intern Med. 1997. PMID: 9265424 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters in an intensive care unit with a low blood stream infection rate after implementation of an educational program: a before-after trial.Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2007 Aug;8(4):445-54. doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.073. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2007. PMID: 17883361 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. Catheter Study Group.N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 7;340(1):1-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901073400101. N Engl J Med. 1999. PMID: 9878638 Clinical Trial.
-
Prevention of bloodstream infections with central venous catheters treated with anti-infective agents depends on catheter type and insertion time: evidence from a meta-analysis.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002 Dec;23(12):748-56. doi: 10.1086/502005. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002. PMID: 12517018
-
Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane review.Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(8):738-46. doi: 10.1002/nau.20645. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008. PMID: 18951451 Review.
Cited by
-
Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing for prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis*.Crit Care Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1703-13. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000319. Crit Care Med. 2014. PMID: 24674924 Free PMC article.
-
What is new for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections?Ann Transl Med. 2016 Mar;4(6):119. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.03.10. Ann Transl Med. 2016. PMID: 27127772 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial-impregnated catheters for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections.World J Crit Care Med. 2016 May 4;5(2):137-42. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i2.137. eCollection 2016 May 4. World J Crit Care Med. 2016. PMID: 27152256 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Continuous renal replacement therapy may increase the risk of catheter infection.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Aug;5(8):1489-96. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02130310. Epub 2010 Jun 17. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010. PMID: 20558562 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial Efficacy of a New Chlorhexidine-based Device Against Staphylococcus aureus Colonization of Venous Catheters.J Infus Nurs. 2018 Mar/Apr;41(2):103-112. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000267. J Infus Nurs. 2018. PMID: 29489705 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical