Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Apr;22(2):223-30.
doi: 10.1007/s10554-005-9014-2. Epub 2005 Oct 18.

Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction measured by quantitative gated SPECT: correlation with left ventriculography and first-pass radionuclide angiography

Affiliations

Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction measured by quantitative gated SPECT: correlation with left ventriculography and first-pass radionuclide angiography

Koichiro Abe et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2006 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by quantitative gated SPECT (QGS). We compared the efficacy of LVEF assessment among Tc-99m tetrofosmin gated SPECT imaging, contrast left ventriculography (LVG), and first-pass radionuclide angiography (FP).

Patients: One-hundred and seven patients with ischemic heart disease underwent QGS and LVG simultaneously within 3 months, and 92 of the 107 patients also underwent FP at the same time.

Results: QGS progressively overestimated LVEF at the lower range of end-systolic volume (ESV), especially in patients with small hearts. Moreover, the QGS technique systemically tended to underestimate LVEF in comparison with LVG. However, linear regression analysis demonstrated a good correlation between the LVEF values measured by QGS and those measured by both LVG (p<0.0001) and FP (p<0.0001).

Conclusion: Although QGS has a tendency to overestimate LVEF in patients with small hearts, and to systemically underestimate LVEF compared with LVG, this technique is still a reliable clinical tool for measurement of LVEF.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Heart. 2000 Mar;83(3):283-9 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1982 Feb;65(2):311-22 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001 Jan-Feb;8(1):10-8 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999 Jul-Aug;6(4):412-7 - PubMed
    1. Ann Nucl Med. 2000 Dec;14 (6):421-6 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources