Dispensing error rate in a highly automated mail-service pharmacy practice
- PMID: 16232024
- DOI: 10.1592/phco.2005.25.11.1629
Dispensing error rate in a highly automated mail-service pharmacy practice
Abstract
Study objective: To measure the rate of dispensing errors and to identify the types and sources of dispensing errors in a highly automated mail-service pharmacy practice.
Design: Descriptive analysis of a random sample of completed prescriptions.
Setting: A high-volume mail-service pharmacy practice comprising a network of prescription processing and dispensing pharmacies in the United States.
Measurements and main results: During September and October 2003, new and refill prescriptions were retrieved before shipping and evaluated for dispensing accuracy. Container contents were compared against the container label, and the label record was compared against the original prescription order. The overall dispensing error rate was 0.075% (16 dispensing errors among 21,252 prescriptions, 95% confidence interval 0.043-0.122). Fourteen errors involved incomplete or incorrect directions on the final label. All dispensing errors were associated with the initial stages of prescription processing (including order entry); no errors were associated with the mechanical stages of product dispensing.
Conclusion: A highly automated mail-service pharmacy can achieve a dispensing error rate of less than 1 error/1000 prescriptions, which is substantially lower than the rates reported for retail pharmacies. A high degree of automation in the mechanical aspects of dispensing appears to be a key factor in achieving this high dispensing accuracy.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of mail-service and retail community pharmacy claims in 5 prescription benefit plans.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2009 Jun;5(2):133-42. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2008.06.002. Epub 2009 Jan 31. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2009. PMID: 19524861
-
Incidence, type and causes of dispensing errors: a review of the literature.Int J Pharm Pract. 2009 Feb;17(1):9-30. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009. PMID: 20218026 Review.
-
Accuracy of dispensing in a high-volume, hospital-based outpatient pharmacy.Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994 Nov 15;51(22):2793-7. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994. PMID: 7856602
-
Pharmacist workload and pharmacy characteristics associated with the dispensing of potentially clinically important drug-drug interactions.Med Care. 2007 May;45(5):456-62. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000257839.83765.07. Med Care. 2007. PMID: 17446832
-
Pharmaceutical care in community pharmacies: practice and research in the US.Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Jul-Aug;40(7-8):1400-6. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G545. Ann Pharmacother. 2006. PMID: 16868221 Review.
Cited by
-
Detecting Potential Medication Selection Errors During Outpatient Pharmacy Processing of Electronic Prescriptions With the RxNorm Application Programming Interface: Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Mar 11;8(3):e16073. doi: 10.2196/16073. JMIR Med Inform. 2020. PMID: 32044760 Free PMC article.
-
Direct-to-Consumer Sale of Prescription Drugs by Pharmaceutical Companies: An Assessment of the Patient Experience?J Pharm Technol. 2016 Jun;32(3):98-103. doi: 10.1177/8755122515627361. Epub 2016 Feb 17. J Pharm Technol. 2016. PMID: 34860979 Free PMC article.
-
Count and be counted: preparing future pharmacists to promote a culture of safety.Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Aug 15;70(4):92. doi: 10.5688/aj700492. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006. PMID: 17136211 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Towards improving dose administration aid supply: a quality improvement intervention aimed at reducing dispensing errors.Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Dec;35(6):1152-60. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9839-z. Epub 2013 Aug 23. Int J Clin Pharm. 2013. PMID: 23974987
-
Medication errors in community pharmacies: a systematic review of the international literature.PLoS One. 2025 May 20;20(5):e0322392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322392. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40392881 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical