Similar articles

• Outpatient misoprostol cervical ripening without subsequent induction of labor to prevent post-term pregnancy.

  Oboro VO, Tabowei TO. Oboro VO, et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Jul;84(7):628-31. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00655.x. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005. PMID: 15954870 Clinical Trial.
• Dinoprostone compared with misoprostol for cervical ripening for induction of labor at term.

  Church S, Van Meter A, Whitfield R. Church S, et al. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009 Sep-Oct;54(5):405-411. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.03.006. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009. PMID: 19720343 No abstract available.
• Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone.

  Ande AB, Ezeanochie CM, Olagbuji NB. Ande AB, et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Apr;285(4):967-71. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2094-4. Epub 2011 Oct 20. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012. PMID: 22012248
• Misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a delivery system with accurate dosing and rapid discontinuation.

  Stephenson ML, Hawkins JS, Powers BL, Wing DA. Stephenson ML, et al. Womens Health (Lond). 2014 Jan;10(1):29-36. doi: 10.2217/whe.13.49. Womens Health (Lond). 2014. PMID: 24328596 Review.
• Outpatient cervical ripening.

  Amorosa JM, Stone JL. Amorosa JM, et al. Semin Perinatol. 2015 Oct;39(6):488-94. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Sep 11. Semin Perinatol. 2015. PMID: 26365009 Review.