Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD003514.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003514.pub2.

Bed rest with or without hospitalisation for hypertension during pregnancy

S Meher  1 , E Abalos, G Carroli
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Bed rest with or without hospitalisation for hypertension during pregnancy

S Meher et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Bed rest or restriction of activity, with or without hospitalisation, have been advocated for women with hypertension during pregnancy to improve pregnancy outcome. However, benefits need to be demonstrated before such interventions can be recommended since restricted activity may be disruptive to women's lives, expensive, and increase the risk of thromboembolism.

Objectives: To assess the effects on the mother and the baby of different degrees of bed rest, compared with each other, and with routine activity, in hospital or at home, for primary treatment of hypertension during pregnancy.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (April 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2005), and EMBASE (January 2002 to December 2004).

Selection criteria: Randomised trials evaluating bed rest for women with hypertension in pregnancy were selected.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors assessed trials for inclusion independently, and extracted data. Data were entered into RevMan software and double-checked.

Main results: Four small trials (449 women) were included. Three were of good quality. Two trials (145 women) compared strict bed rest with some rest, in hospital, for women with proteinuric hypertension. There was insufficient evidence to demonstrate any differences between the groups for reported outcomes. Two trials (304 women) compared some bed rest in hospital with routine activity at home for non-proteinuric hypertension. There was reduced risk of severe hypertension (1 trial, 218 women; RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.89) and a borderline reduction in risk of preterm birth (1 trial, 218 women; RR 0.53, CI 0.29 to 0.99) with some rest compared to normal activity. More women in the bed rest group opted not to have the same management in future pregnancies, if the choice were given (1 trial, 86 women; RR 3.00, 95% CI 1.43 to 6.31). There were no significant differences for any other outcomes.

Authors' conclusions: Few randomised trials have evaluated rest for women with hypertension during pregnancy, and important information on side-effects and cost implication is missing from available trials. Although one small trial suggests that some bed rest may be associated with reduced risk of severe hypertension and preterm birth, these findings need to be confirmed in larger trials. At present, there is insufficient evidence to provide clear guidance for clinical practice. Therefore, bed rest should not be recommended routinely for hypertension in pregnancy, especially since more women appear to prefer unrestricted activity, if the choice were given.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Strict bed rest in hospital versus some rest in hospital, Outcome 1 Severe hypertension.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Strict bed rest in hospital versus some rest in hospital, Outcome 2 Severe pre‐eclampsia.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Strict bed rest in hospital versus some rest in hospital, Outcome 3 Eclampsia.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Strict bed rest in hospital versus some rest in hospital, Outcome 4 Elective delivery including elective caesarean section or induction of labour, or both.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Strict bed rest in hospital versus some rest in hospital, Outcome 5 Placental abruption.
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Strict bed rest in hospital versus some rest in hospital, Outcome 6 Death of baby, including miscarriage, stillbirth, perinatal death, and neonatal death.
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Strict bed rest in hospital versus some rest in hospital, Outcome 7 Death of baby by timing of death.
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Strict bed rest in hospital versus some rest in hospital, Outcome 8 Preterm birth.
1.9
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 Strict bed rest in hospital versus some rest in hospital, Outcome 9 Endotracheal intubation.
1.10
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 Strict bed rest in hospital versus some rest in hospital, Outcome 10 Admission to neonatal intensive care nursery.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Some rest in hospital versus routine activity at home, Outcome 1 Severe hypertension.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Some rest in hospital versus routine activity at home, Outcome 2 Pre‐eclampsia.
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 Some rest in hospital versus routine activity at home, Outcome 3 Elective delivery, including elective caesarean section or induction of labour, or both.
2.4
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 Some rest in hospital versus routine activity at home, Outcome 4 Caesarean section.
2.5
2.5. Analysis
Comparison 2 Some rest in hospital versus routine activity at home, Outcome 5 Death of baby.
2.6
2.6. Analysis
Comparison 2 Some rest in hospital versus routine activity at home, Outcome 6 Death of baby by timing of death.
2.7
2.7. Analysis
Comparison 2 Some rest in hospital versus routine activity at home, Outcome 7 Small‐for‐gestational age.
2.8
2.8. Analysis
Comparison 2 Some rest in hospital versus routine activity at home, Outcome 8 Preterm birth.
2.9
2.9. Analysis
Comparison 2 Some rest in hospital versus routine activity at home, Outcome 9 Preterm birth (subgroup by gestational age).
2.10
2.10. Analysis
Comparison 2 Some rest in hospital versus routine activity at home, Outcome 10 Admission to neonatal intensive care unit.
2.11
2.11. Analysis
Comparison 2 Some rest in hospital versus routine activity at home, Outcome 11 Women satisfied with management.
2.12
2.12. Analysis
Comparison 2 Some rest in hospital versus routine activity at home, Outcome 12 Women not choosing same management for future pregnancy.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003514

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

Crowther 1986 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Crowther CA. Strict bed rest vs ambulation in the management of patients with proteinuric hypertension in pregnancy. Personal communication 2004.
Crowther 1992 {published data only}
    1. Crowther CA, Bouwmeester AM, Ashurst HM. Does admission to hospital for bed rest prevent disease progression or improve fetal outcome in pregnancy complicated by non‐proteinuric hypertension?. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1992;99:13‐7.
Leung 1998 {published data only}
    1. Leung KY, Sum TK, Tse CY, Law KM, Chan MYM. Is in‐patient management of diastolic blood pressure between 90 and 100 mm Hg during pregnancy necessary?. Hong Kong Medical Journal 1998;4:211‐7.
Mathews 1982 {published data only}
    1. Mathews DD, Agarwal V, Shuttleworth TP. A randomized controlled trial of complete bed rest vs ambulation in the management of proteinuric hypertension during pregnancy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1982;89:128‐31.
    1. Mathews DD, Agarwal V, Shuttleworth TP. The effect of rest and ambulation on plasma urea and urate levels in pregnant women with proteinuric hypertension. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1980;87:1095‐8.

References to studies excluded from this review

Cameron 1985 {published data only}
    1. Cameron AD, Walker JJ, Bonduelle M, Calder AA. A randomised trial of the antihypertensive agent, labetalol, against bed rest in pregnancy hypertension. Archives of Gynecology 1985;237 Suppl:295.
Catalano 1997 {published data only}
    1. Catalano D, Ercolano S, Pollio F, Ascione L, Russo C, De S, et al. Evaluation of the monotherapy with nifedipine in the management of preeclampsia [Valutazione della monoterapia con nifedipina nel management della gestosi EPH]. Giornale Italiano Di Ostetricia e Ginecologia 1997;19:373‐5.
Herrera 1993 {published data only}
    1. Herrera JA. Nutritional factors and rest reduce pregnancy‐induced hypertension and pre‐eclampsia in positive roll‐over test primigravidas. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 1993;41:31‐5.
Mathews 1977 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Mathews DD. A randomized controlled trial of bed rest and sedation or normal activity and non‐sedation in the management of non‐albuminuric hypertension in late pregnancy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1977;84:108‐14.
Sibai 1992 {published data only}
    1. Barton JR, Mercer BM, Sibai BM. The effect of nifedipine on urinary excretion of calcium in preeclampsia. American Journal of Perinatology 1997;14(10):609‐12.
    1. Sibai BM, Barton JR, Akl S, Sarinoglu C, Mercer BM. A randomized prospective comparison of nifedipine and bed rest versus bed rest alone in the management of preeclampsia remote from term. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992;167(4 Pt 1):879‐84.
    1. Sibai BM, Barton JR, Akl S, Sarinoglu C, Mercer BM. A randomized prospective comparison of nifedipine and bed rest vs bed rest alone in the management of preeclampsia remote from term. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992;166:280.
Somers 1989 {published data only}
    1. Somers PJ, Gevirtz RN, Jasin SE, Chin HG. The efficacy of biobehavioral and compliance interventions in the adjunctive treatment of mild pregnancy‐induced hypertension. Biofeedback & Self Regulation 1989;14:309‐18.
Spinapolice 1983 {published data only}
    1. Spinapolice RX, Feld S, Harrigan JT. Effective prevention of gestational hypertension in nulliparous women at high risk as identified by the rollover test. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1983;146:166‐8.

Additional references

Abalos 2007
    1. Abalos E, Duley L, Steyn DW, Henderson‐Smart DJ. Antihypertensive drug therapy for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 1. [Art. No.: CD002252. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002252.pub2]
ACOG 1996
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Hypertension in Pregnancy. ACOG Technical Bulletin 1996;219:1‐8.
ASSHP 1993
    1. Anonymous. Australian Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy: Consensus statement: management of hypertension in pregnancy: executive summary. Medical Journal of Australia 1993;158:700‐2.
Chesley 1978
    1. Chesley LC. Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy. New York: Appleton‐Century‐Crofts, 1978.
Davey 1988
    1. Davey DA, MacGilivray I. The classification and definition of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1988;158:892‐8.
Duley 2005
    1. Duley L, Henderson‐Smart D, Meher S. Altered dietary salt for preventing pre‐eclampsia, and its complications. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 4. [Art. No.: CD005548. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005548.]
Duley 2006
    1. Duley L, Henderson‐Smart DJ, Meher S. Drugs for treatment of very high blood pressure during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3. [Art. No.: CD001449. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001449.pub2]
Duley 2007
    1. Duley L, Henderson‐Smart DJ, Meher S, King JF. Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre‐eclampsia and its complications. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2. [Art. No.: CD004659. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004659.pub2]
Goldenberg 1994
    1. Goldenberg R, Cliver S, Bronstein J, Cutter G, Andrews W, Mennemeyer S. Bed rest in pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1994;84:131‐6.
Hamlin 1952
    1. Hamlin RHJ. The prevention of eclampsia and pre‐eclampsia. Lancet 1952;i:64‐8.
Hofmeyr 1996
    1. Hofmeyr GJ. Abdominal decompression for suspected fetal compromise/pre‐eclampsia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1996, Issue 1. [Art. No.: CD000004. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000004]
Kramer 1986
    1. Kramer P, Constan D, Krzeminiski J, Brondi D, Martin C. Hospitalisation on the high risk maternity unit. General Hospital Psychiatry 1986;8:33‐9.
Kröner 2001
    1. Kröner C, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C. Antenatal day care units versus hospital admission for women with complicated pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 4. [Art. No.: CD001803. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001803]
Lindheimer 1999
    1. Lindheimer MD, Roberts JM, Cunningham FG. Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy. 2nd Edition. Stamford, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange, 1999.
Magee 2003
    1. Magee LA, Duley L. Oral beta‐blockers for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 3. [Art. No.: CD002863. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002863]
Maloni 1993
    1. Maloni JA, Chance B, Zhang C, Cohen AW, Betts D, Gange SJ. Physical and psychosocial side effects of antepartum hospital bed rest. Nursing Research 1993;42:197‐203.
Meher 2005
    1. Meher S, Duley L, Prevention of Pre‐eclampsia Cochrane Review authors. Interventions for preventing pre‐eclampsia and its consequences: generic protocol. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. [Art. No.: CD005301. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005301]
NHBPEP 2000
    1. Anonymous. Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;183(1):S1‐S22.
North 1999
    1. North RA, Taylor RS, Schellenberg JC. Evaluation of the definition of pre‐eclampsia. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1999;106:767‐73.
RevMan 2003 [Computer program]
    1. The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 4.2 for Windows. Oxford, England: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2003.
Roberts 1993
    1. Roberts JM, Redman CWG. Pre‐eclampsia: more than pregnancy‐induced hypertension. Lancet 1993;341:1447‐51.
Sanderson 1991
    1. Sanderson M, Placek PJ, Keppel KG. The 1998 national maternal and infant health survey: design, content, and data availability. Birth 1991;18:26‐32.
Saudan 1998
    1. Saudan P, Brown M, Buddle M, Jones M. Does gestational hypertension become pre‐eclampsia?. British Journal of Obstetric and Gynaecology 1998;105:1177‐84.
Sibai 1998
    1. Sibai BM, Lindheimer MD, Hauth J, Caritis S, Dorsten P, Klebanoff M, et al. Risk factors for preeclampsia, abruptio placentae, and adverse neonatal outcomes among women with chronic hypertension. New England Journal of Medicine 1998;339:667‐71.
Walker 2000
    1. Walker J. Pre‐eclampsia. Lancet 2000;356:1260‐5.