Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Oct;7(4):525-34.
doi: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60584-3.

Assay validation for identification of hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer-causing mutations in mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6

Affiliations

Assay validation for identification of hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer-causing mutations in mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6

Madhuri Hegde et al. J Mol Diagn. 2005 Oct.

Abstract

Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) 114500) is an autosomal dominant disorder that is genetically heterogeneous because of underlying mutations in mismatch repair genes, primarily MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6. One challenge to correctly diagnosing HNPCC is that the large size of the causative genes makes identification of mutations both labor intensive and expensive. We evaluated the usefulness of denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) for scanning mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6) for point mutations, small deletions, and insertions. Our assay consisted of 51 sets of primers designed to amplify all exons of these genes. All polymerase chain reaction reactions were amplified simultaneously using the same reaction conditions in a 96-well format. The amplified products were analyzed by DHPLC across a range of optimum temperatures for partial fragment denaturation based on the melting profile of each specific fragment. DNA specimens from 23 previously studied HNPCC patients were analyzed by DHPLC, and all mutations were correctly identified and confirmed by sequence analysis. Here, we present our validation studies of the DHPLC platform for HNPCC mutation analysis and compare its merits with other scanning technologies. This approach provides greater sensitivity and more directed molecular analysis for clinical testing in HNPCC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
DHPLC profiles for MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 mutations. The DHPLC profiles of HNPCC patients with mutations in mismatch repair genes are shown for all of the mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 used for assay validation compared with the wild-type profiles, respectively. The wild-type profile is shown on the top and mutant profile at the bottom of individual profiles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
DHPLC profiles for MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 polymorphisms. The DHPLC profiles of HNPCC patients with polymorphisms in mismatch repair genes are shown for all of the mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 used for assay validation compared with the wild-type profiles, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
DHPLC profiles for MSH6 intron 6 variable poly(T) region. Note the nonspecific heteroduplexes immediately before the main peak, indicating a highly polymorphic region. The wild-type profile is on the top and the poly(T) profile is shown below it.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Proposed strategy for genetic testing in colorectal cancer patients. A comprehensive strategy incorporating 1) family history and clinical data; 2) microsatellite instability; and 3) immunohistochemistry as screening tools mutation for targeted analysis. Methylation testing further focuses the process on samples most likely to carry a germline mutation (ie, microsatellite unstable, unmethylated, and IHC-positive tumors).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Algorithm for DHPLC screening for identification of mutations in mismatch repair genes in colorectal cancer patients.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burt RW. Familial risk and colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1996;25:793–803. - PubMed
    1. Burt RW. Familial association. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1999;470:99–104. - PubMed
    1. Coughlin SS, Miller DS. Public health perspectives on testing for colorectal cancer susceptibility genes. Am J Prev Med. 1999;16:99–104. - PubMed
    1. de Leon MP, Pedroni M, Benatti P, Percesepe A, Di Gregorio C, Foroni M, Rossi G, Genuardi M, Neri G, Leonardi F, Viel A, Capozzi E, Boiocchi M, Roncucci L. Hereditary colorectal cancer in the general population: from cancer registration to molecular diagnosis. Gut. 1999;45:32–38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cederquist K, Golovleva I, Emanuelsson M, Stenling R, Gronberg H. A population based cohort study of patients with multiple colon and endometrial cancer: correlation of microsatellite instability (MSI) status, age at diagnosis and cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 2001;91:486–491. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms