Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Nov;6(6):405-9.
doi: 10.1007/s11934-005-0033-2.

The Q-T interval and antimuscarinic drugs

Affiliations
Review

The Q-T interval and antimuscarinic drugs

Roger Dmochowski et al. Curr Urol Rep. 2005 Nov.

Abstract

Antimuscarinic drugs form the mainstay of pharmacotherapy for the treatment of overactive bladder. The primary sites of activity of the agents for the desired therapeutic effect are the M3 and M2 receptors of the bladder. Drug interaction with other non-vesical muscarinic receptors produces a range of undesired adverse events. In general, certain adverse effects associated with antimuscarinic agents such as dry mouth (salivary) and constipation (colon) may be considered only bothersome, and somnolence and confusion (central nervous system) may be considered more serious in nature. However, effects on the myocardium are considered to be more significant safety issues and increased awareness and understanding of the effect of drugs on the myocardium, including the additional effects of drug-drug interaction, has increased a need for the evaluation of new drugs for cardiac safety. The role of genetics (and the identification of populations at risk) in the causation of congenital dysrhythmias has received specific attention in this area. New drugs now must undergo more intense scrutiny and cardiac testing to evaluate their effects on cardiac rate and rhythm, especially the QT interval. The recently approved agents (trospium, solifenacin, darifenacin) used for the treatment of overactive bladder have been rigorously evaluated for these effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 4;350(10):1013-22 - PubMed
    1. Hum Exp Toxicol. 1991 May;10(3):225-6 - PubMed
    1. Curr Urol Rep. 2003 Dec;4(6):421-8 - PubMed
    1. Urology. 1997 Dec;50(6A Suppl):90-6; discussion 97-9 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1991 Jun 15;302(6790):1469 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances