National trends in surgical procedures for degenerative cervical spine disease: 1990-2000
- PMID: 16239888
National trends in surgical procedures for degenerative cervical spine disease: 1990-2000
Abstract
Objective: Degenerative cervical spine disease is one of the most common indications for spinal surgical intervention. The impact of the unprecedented changes in healthcare technology and delivery over the past decade is unknown. We examined this issue using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, a representative sample of all United States inpatient hospitalizations.
Methods: All adult patients undergoing spinal procedures with a principal diagnosis of cervical spine disease were selected for analysis according to International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision clinical modification codes. Patients diagnosed with infection, neoplasia, fracture, or trauma, as well as those with noncervical or nonspecific principal diagnoses, were excluded.
Results: The total number of cervical spine procedures in the sampled population rose twofold, from 53,810 in 1990 to 112,400 in 2000. Anterior fusion procedures rose (17.8-69.5% of procedures), whereas nonfusion decompressions declined sharply (70.5-24.6%). Patient diversity increased with increasing rates of surgery among women (25.0-51.0 per 100,000) and minorities (18.4-45.7 per 100,000). Although average age (47.5-49.2 yr) and medical comorbidities (8.7-13.5% of patients) increased, mortality (0.21-0.14% of hospitalizations) and average length of stay (5.2-2.2 d) declined. Inflation-adjusted hospital charges rose by 48% to a total exceeding 2 billion dollars in 2000.
Conclusion: Compared with one decade ago, the surgical treatment of degenerative cervical spine disease has evolved to include a higher percentage of anterior and fusion procedures performed on a more diverse, older, and comorbid patient population, with shortened hospital stay and improved morbidity and mortality, although at substantially increased cost.
Similar articles
-
Complications and mortality associated with cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease in the United States.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 1;32(3):342-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000254120.25411.ae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. PMID: 17268266
-
Impact of surgical approach on complications and resource utilization of cervical spine fusion: a nationwide perspective to the surgical treatment of diffuse cervical spondylosis.Spine J. 2009 Jan-Feb;9(1):31-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Sep 14. Spine J. 2009. PMID: 18790678
-
Cervical spine reoperation rates and hospital resource utilization after initial surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease in 12,338 patients in Washington State.Neurosurgery. 2009 Dec;65(6):1011-22; discussion 1022-3. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000360347.10596.BD. Neurosurgery. 2009. PMID: 19934960
-
Rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation and surgical management of the cervical spine.Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6):689-700. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.001. Spine J. 2004. PMID: 15541704 Review.
-
Surgery for failed cervical spine reconstruction.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 1;37(5):E323-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823ec9d2. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012. PMID: 22076644 Review.
Cited by
-
Novel Calcium Phosphate Promotes Interbody Bony Fusion in a Porcine Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Model.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Sep 1;49(17):1179-1186. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004916. Epub 2024 Jan 12. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024. PMID: 38213106 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical laminoforaminotomy for radiculopathy: Symptomatic and functional outcomes in a large cohort with long-term follow-up.Surg Neurol Int. 2014 Dec 30;5(Suppl 15):S536-43. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.148029. eCollection 2014. Surg Neurol Int. 2014. PMID: 25593773 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the ovine model.J Vis Exp. 2009 Oct 5;(32):1548. doi: 10.3791/1548. J Vis Exp. 2009. PMID: 19806065 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution in practice: how has British neurosurgery changed in the last 10 years?Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Sep;90(6):508-12. doi: 10.1308/003588408X321530. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008. PMID: 18765031 Free PMC article.
-
Socioeconomic and regional differences in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Surg Neurol Int. 2017 May 26;8:92. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_471_16. eCollection 2017. Surg Neurol Int. 2017. PMID: 28607826 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous