Ant navigation en route to the goal: signature routes facilitate way-finding of Gigantiops destructor
- PMID: 16240146
- DOI: 10.1007/s00359-005-0064-7
Ant navigation en route to the goal: signature routes facilitate way-finding of Gigantiops destructor
Abstract
We investigated in laboratory conditions how foragers of the tropical ant Gigantiops destructor develop individually distinctive landmark routes. Way-finding along a familiar route involved the recognition of at least two locations, nest and feeding site, and the representation of spatial relations between these places. Familiar visual landmarks were important both at the beginning and at the end of the foraging journey. A motor routine guided the ants at the start of their foraging path towards the first landmarks, which they learnt to pass consistently on the same side, before taking the next direction. At the last stage of the route, landmark recognition allowed them to pinpoint their preferred feeding site without using distant cues or odometric information. By contrast, ants en route to the goal were not systematically guided by a stereotyped sequence of snapshots recalled at each corresponding stage of the route. Each ant slalomed in an idiosyncratic distinctive way around different midway landmarks from a foraging excursion to the next, which induced a variability of the path shapes in their intermediate parts. By reducing the number of landmark recognition-triggered responses, this economical visuomotor strategy may be helpful in the Amazonian forest where many prominent landmarks are alike.
Similar articles
-
Landmark learning, cue conflict, and outbound view sequence in navigating desert ants.J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2018 Oct;44(4):409-421. doi: 10.1037/xan0000178. Epub 2018 Jul 5. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2018. PMID: 29975078
-
Sequential learning of relative size by the Neotropical ant Gigantiops destructor.J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2016 Apr;202(4):287-96. doi: 10.1007/s00359-016-1075-2. Epub 2016 Feb 15. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2016. PMID: 26879665
-
Homing strategies of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. II. Interaction of the path integrator with visual cue information.J Exp Biol. 2007 May;210(Pt 10):1804-12. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02769. J Exp Biol. 2007. PMID: 17488944
-
How do insects represent familiar terrain?J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jan-Jun;98(1-3):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.012. J Physiol Paris. 2004. PMID: 15477037 Review.
-
The neuroethology of ant navigation.Curr Biol. 2025 Feb 3;35(3):R110-R124. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.12.034. Curr Biol. 2025. PMID: 39904309 Review.
Cited by
-
Multimodal interactions in insect navigation.Anim Cogn. 2020 Nov;23(6):1129-1141. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01383-2. Epub 2020 Apr 22. Anim Cogn. 2020. PMID: 32323027 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Innate visual attraction before, during and after escape from adverse substrates in carpenter ants.J Exp Biol. 2025 Jul 1;228(13):jeb250278. doi: 10.1242/jeb.250278. Epub 2025 Jul 8. J Exp Biol. 2025. PMID: 40554759 Free PMC article.
-
Views, landmarks, and routes: how do desert ants negotiate an obstacle course?J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2011 Feb;197(2):167-79. doi: 10.1007/s00359-010-0597-2. Epub 2010 Oct 23. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2011. PMID: 20972570
-
Trail using ants follow idiosyncratic routes in complex landscapes.Learn Behav. 2024 Mar;52(1):105-113. doi: 10.3758/s13420-023-00615-y. Epub 2023 Nov 22. Learn Behav. 2024. PMID: 37993707 Free PMC article.
-
Which portion of the natural panorama is used for view-based navigation in the Australian desert ant?J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2009 Jul;195(7):681-9. doi: 10.1007/s00359-009-0443-6. Epub 2009 Apr 29. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2009. PMID: 19404647
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials