Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2005 Nov;29(4):347-52.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.07.002.

A quantitative analysis of fish consumption and stroke risk

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A quantitative analysis of fish consumption and stroke risk

Colleen Bouzan et al. Am J Prev Med. 2005 Nov.

Abstract

Although a rich source of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) that may confer multiple health benefits, some fish contain methyl mercury (MeHg), which may harm the developing fetus. U.S. government recommendations for women of childbearing age are to modify consumption of high-MeHg fish to reduce MeHg exposure, while recommendations encourage fish consumption among the general population because of the nutritional benefits. The Harvard Center for Risk Analysis convened an expert panel (see acknowledgements) to quantify the net impact of resulting hypothetical changes in fish consumption across the population. This paper estimates the impact of fish consumption on stroke risk. Other papers quantify coronary heart disease mortality risk and the impacts of both prenatal MeHg exposure and maternal intake of n-3 PUFAs on cognitive development. This analysis identified articles in a recent qualitative literature review that are appropriate for the development of a dose-response relationship between fish consumption and stroke risk. Studies had to satisfy quality criteria, quantify fish intake, and report the precision of the relative risk estimates. The analysis combined the relative risk results, weighting each proportionately to its precision. Six studies were identified as appropriate for inclusion in this analysis, including five prospective cohort studies and one case-control study (total of 24 exposure groups). Our analysis indicates that any fish consumption confers substantial relative risk reduction compared to no fish consumption (12% for the linear model), with the possibility that additional consumption confers incremental benefits (central estimate of 2.0% per serving per week).

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Fish: balancing health risks and benefits.
    Willett WC. Willett WC. Am J Prev Med. 2005 Nov;29(4):320-1. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.07.029. Am J Prev Med. 2005. PMID: 16242596 No abstract available.
  • Fish, health, and sustainability.
    McMichael AJ, Butler CD. McMichael AJ, et al. Am J Prev Med. 2005 Nov;29(4):322-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.07.033. Am J Prev Med. 2005. PMID: 16242597 No abstract available.

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources