Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data
- PMID: 16248933
- DOI: 10.1348/000712605X47422
Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data
Abstract
How is information extracted from familiar and unfamiliar faces? Three experiments, in which eye-movement measures were used, examined whether there was differential sampling of the internal face region according to familiarity. Experiment 1 used a face familiarity task and found that whilst the majority of fixations fell within the internal region, there were no differences in the sampling of this region according to familiarity. Experiment 2 replicated these findings, using a standard recognition memory paradigm. The third experiment employed a matching task, and once again found that the majority of fixations fell within the internal region. Additionally, this experiment found that there was more sampling of the internal region when faces were familiar compared with when they were unfamiliar. The use of eye fixation measures affirms the importance of internal facial features in the recognition of familiar faces compared with unfamiliar faces, but only when viewers compare pairs of faces.
Similar articles
-
7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift.Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004 Aug;57(6):1019-29. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000657. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004. PMID: 15370514
-
Attention to internal face features in unfamiliar face matching.Br J Psychol. 2008 Aug;99(Pt 3):379-94. doi: 10.1348/000712607X235872. Epub 2007 Aug 16. Br J Psychol. 2008. PMID: 17706001
-
Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.Brain Res. 2008 Sep 4;1228:177-88. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.092. Epub 2008 Jul 2. Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18634766 Clinical Trial.
-
Face familiarity feelings, the right temporal lobe and the possible underlying neural mechanisms.Brain Res Rev. 2007 Nov;56(1):214-35. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.07.009. Epub 2007 Aug 3. Brain Res Rev. 2007. PMID: 17822771 Review.
-
Affective processing of loved familiar faces: integrating central and peripheral electrophysiological measures.Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Jul;85(1):79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Jul 5. Int J Psychophysiol. 2012. PMID: 21689694 Review.
Cited by
-
Scan patterns during the processing of facial identity in prosopagnosia.Exp Brain Res. 2007 Aug;181(2):199-211. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0923-2. Epub 2007 Mar 15. Exp Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17361425
-
Scanning strategies do not modulate face identification: eye-tracking and near-infrared spectroscopy study.PLoS One. 2010 Jun 10;5(6):e11050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011050. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20548791 Free PMC article.
-
The face inversion effect is not a consequence of aberrant eye movements.Mem Cognit. 2007 Dec;35(8):1977-85. doi: 10.3758/bf03192930. Mem Cognit. 2007. PMID: 18265613
-
The revealing glance: eye gaze behavior to concealed information.Mem Cognit. 2012 May;40(4):642-51. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0173-1. Mem Cognit. 2012. PMID: 22194248
-
Role of facial familiarity and emotional expression intensity in ensemble emotion perception.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Aug;85(6):1990-2003. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02720-6. Epub 2023 May 22. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023. PMID: 37217820 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources