Supplemental perioperative oxygen and the risk of surgical wound infection: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 16249417
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.16.2035
Supplemental perioperative oxygen and the risk of surgical wound infection: a randomized controlled trial
Erratum in
- JAMA. 2005 Dec 21;294(23):2973
Abstract
Context: Supplemental perioperative oxygen has been variously reported to halve or double the risk of surgical wound infection.
Objective: To test the hypothesis that supplemental oxygen reduces infection risk in patients following colorectal surgery.
Design, setting, and patients: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial of 300 patients aged 18 to 80 years who underwent elective colorectal surgery in 14 Spanish hospitals from March 1, 2003, to October 31, 2004. Wound infections were diagnosed by blinded investigators using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Baseline patient characteristics, anesthetic treatment, and potential confounding factors were recorded.
Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to either 30% or 80% fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) intraoperatively and for 6 hours after surgery. Anesthetic treatment and antibiotic administration were standardized.
Main outcome measures: Any surgical site infection (SSI); secondary outcomes included return of bowel function and ability to tolerate solid food, ambulation, suture removal, and duration of hospitalization.
Results: A total of 143 patients received 30% perioperative oxygen and 148 received 80% perioperative oxygen. Surgical site infection occurred in 35 patients (24.4%) administered 30% FIO2 and in 22 patients (14.9%) administered 80% FIO2 (P=.04). The risk of SSI was 39% lower in the 80% FIO2 group (relative risk [RR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.98) vs the 30% FIO2 group. After adjustment for important covariates, the RR of infection in patients administered supplemental oxygen was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.22-0.95; P = .04). None of the secondary outcomes varied significantly between the 2 treatment groups.
Conclusions: Patients receiving supplemental inspired oxygen had a significant reduction in the risk of wound infection. Supplemental oxygen appears to be an effective intervention to reduce SSI in patients undergoing colon or rectal surgery. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00235456.
Comment in
-
Increasing inspired oxygen to decrease surgical site infection: time to shift the quality improvement research paradigm.JAMA. 2005 Oct 26;294(16):2091-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.16.2091. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 16249425 No abstract available.
-
Supplemental oxygen and risk of surgical wound infection.JAMA. 2006 Apr 12;295(14):1641-2; author reply 1642-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.14.1641-b. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16609079 No abstract available.
-
Supplemental oxygen and risk of surgical wound infection.JAMA. 2006 Apr 12;295(14):1641; author reply 1642-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.14.1641-a. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16609080 No abstract available.
-
Supplemental oxygen and risk of surgical wound infection.JAMA. 2006 Apr 12;295(14):1642; author reply 1642-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.14.1642-a. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16609081 No abstract available.
-
Supplemental perioperative oxygen at 80% FIO2 reduced surgical site infections in elective colorectal surgery.Evid Based Nurs. 2006 Apr;9(2):52. doi: 10.1136/ebn.9.2.52. Evid Based Nurs. 2006. PMID: 16622929 No abstract available.
-
Canadian Association of General Surgeons and American College of Surgeons Evidence Based Reviews in Surgery. 21: the risk of surgical site infection is reduced with perioperative oxygen.Can J Surg. 2007 Jun;50(3):214-6. Can J Surg. 2007. PMID: 17568494 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
