Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators
- PMID: 16252077
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0384-2
Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators
Abstract
The Work Group for Evaluation and Implementation of Simulators and Skills Training Programmes is a newly formed sub-group of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES). This work group undertook a review of validation evidence for surgical simulators and the resulting consensus is presented in this article. Using clinical guidelines criteria, the evidence for validation for six different simulators was rated and subsequently translated to a level of recommendation for each system. The simulators could be divided into two basic types; systems for laparoscopic general surgery and flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy. Selection of simulators for inclusion in this consensus was based on their availability and relatively widespread usage as of July 2004. Whilst level 2 recommendations were achieved for a few systems, it was clear that there was an overall lack of published validation studies with rigorous experimental methodology. Since the consensus meeting, there have been a number of new articles, system upgrades and new devices available. The work group intends to update these consensus guidelines on a regular basis, with the resulting article available on the EAES website (http://www.eaes-eur.org ).
Comment in
-
Time for evidence-based minimal access surgery training--simulate or sink.Surg Endosc. 2005 Dec;19(12):1521-2. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0441-x. Surg Endosc. 2005. PMID: 16247572 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.Simul Healthc. 2006 Fall;1(3):171-9. doi: 10.1097/01.SIH.0000244452.43542.47. Simul Healthc. 2006. PMID: 19088587
-
A Review of Endoscopic Simulation: Current Evidence on Simulators and Curricula.J Surg Educ. 2016 Jan-Feb;73(1):12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Dec 11. J Surg Educ. 2016. PMID: 26699281 Review.
-
Changing the way we train surgeons in the 21th century: A narrative comparative review focused on box trainers and virtual reality simulators.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Apr;235:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Jan 22. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019. PMID: 30772529 Review.
-
Virtual reality simulators: valuable surgical skills trainers or video games?J Surg Educ. 2014 May-Jun;71(3):426-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.11.003. Epub 2014 Jan 3. J Surg Educ. 2014. PMID: 24797861
-
[THE ROLE OF SIMULATION IN SURGICAL TRAINING--A NEW ERA].Harefuah. 2015 Jun;154(6):398-403. Harefuah. 2015. PMID: 26281087 Hebrew.
Cited by
-
3D immersive patient simulators and their impact on learning success: a thematic review.J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 8;17(4):e91. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3492. J Med Internet Res. 2015. PMID: 25858862 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of a vegetable model as a training tool for PCNL puncture.Indian J Urol. 2015 Apr-Jun;31(2):156-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.152922. Indian J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25878423 Free PMC article.
-
The Validation of Surgical Simulators: A Technical Report on Current Validation Terminology as a Reference for Future Research.Cureus. 2022 Nov 25;14(11):e31881. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31881. eCollection 2022 Nov. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36579220 Free PMC article.
-
Development of an ex vivo simulated training model for laparoscopic liver resection.Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1677-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1440-0. Epub 2010 Nov 12. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 21072669
-
Technical skills assessment as part of the selection process for a fellowship in minimally invasive surgery.Surg Endosc. 2009 Mar;23(3):641-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0033-7. Epub 2008 Sep 24. Surg Endosc. 2009. PMID: 18813975
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical