Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jun-Sep;23(2-3):133-41.

LipL32, an outer membrane protein of Leptospira, as an antigen in a dipstick assay for diagnosis of leptospirosis

Affiliations
  • PMID: 16252844
Free article

LipL32, an outer membrane protein of Leptospira, as an antigen in a dipstick assay for diagnosis of leptospirosis

Doojdao Boonyod et al. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2005 Jun-Sep.
Free article

Abstract

Microscopic agglutination test (MAT), as well as other serological assays that aimed at detecting antibodies to Leptospira, supplements the leptospirosis diagnosis based on the clinical features. Nevertheless, false positive results have been occasionally reported when the crude antigen was used in those antibody-based tests due either to the presence of antibodies stimulated by other antigenically related pathogens in the patient's serum, or the antibodies in the serum may be stimulated by a previously unrecognized Leptospira infection, especially in the disease endemic areas. Thus, the more refined antigen should improve the serodiagnostic accuracy. Among Leptospira spp., LipL32, which is a pathogenic Leptospira outer membrane protein (OMP), expressed by the bacteria grown both in vitro and in vivo. In this study, recombinant LipL32 protein was tested by a dipstick method for its potential in serodiagnosis of leptospirosis. Preliminary results suggest that the recombinant LipL32 is a good diagnostic detection reagent for specific Leptospira IgG. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the Lip32 dipstick assay, when compared to those of MAT, were 100% and 98.33%, respectively.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources