Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Oct 27:4:28.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-4-28.

Age as a determinant of nutritional status: a cross sectional study

Affiliations

Age as a determinant of nutritional status: a cross sectional study

Sarah Forster et al. Nutr J. .

Abstract

Background: Undenutrition is known to be prevalent and largely unrecognised in older patients; however, aberrations in indicators of nutritional status may simply reflect effects of age and/or functional disability.

Objective: The aim of this study was to measure the effect, if any of age on nutritional status in older patients.

Design: 445 randomly selected hospitalised patients consented to nutritional status assessment derived from anthropometric, haematological, and biochemical data within 72 hours of admission. Nutritional status was compared between those age < 75 years and those aged 75 years or more. Using multiple regression models, we measured the association between age and nutritional assessment variables after adjusting for disability, chronic illness, medications, smoking and tissue inflammation.

Results: Body weight, body mass index, mid-upper arm circumference, haemoglobin, serum albumin and plasma ascorbic acid were all significantly lower in people aged > or = 75 years compared with those < 75 years of age. Although riboflavin (vitamin B2), 25OH VitD3, red-cell folate and vitamin B12 concentrations were lower in those aged > or = 75 years, differences were not statistically significant. After adjusting for disability and co-morbidity in a multivariate analysis, age alone had a significant and independent effect on important anthropometric and biochemical nutritional assessment variables.

Conclusion: Increasing age is independently associated with poor nutritional status. This may partly explain the poor clinical outcome in older patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Population: by gender and age 1901–2026: Social Trends 2001; 31 (ST 31103) Office of National Statistics, UK; 2001.
    1. Gariballa SE. Nutrition and older people: special consideration for ageing. Clinical Medicine. 2004;4:411–413. - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacIntosh CG, Morley JE, Horowitz M, Chapman IM. Anorexia of Ageing. Nutrition. 2000;16:983–995. doi: 10.1016/S0899-9007(00)00405-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gariballa SE, Parker SG, Taub N, Castleden CM. The influence of nutritional status on clinical outcome after acute ischaemic stroke. Am J of Clin Nutr. 1998;68:275–281. - PubMed
    1. Sullivan DH, Walls RC. Impact of nutritional status on morbidity in a population of geriatric rehabilitation patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:471–77. - PubMed