Comparison and interpretation of urinalysis performed by a nephrologist versus a hospital-based clinical laboratory
- PMID: 16253721
- DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.07.039
Comparison and interpretation of urinalysis performed by a nephrologist versus a hospital-based clinical laboratory
Abstract
Background: Urinalysis (UA) is considered the most important laboratory test in evaluating patients with kidney disease. Anecdotally, we have observed differences between results of UA performed by nephrologists compared with those performed by certified medical technologists or clinical laboratory scientists that could affect a clinician's diagnosis. Whether there are differences between UA performed by the clinical laboratory and that performed by a nephrologist was determined, and accuracy of diagnosis based on interpretation of the UA was compared.
Methods: Urine samples were obtained from 26 patients with acute renal failure (ARF). An aliquot of urine was sent to the clinical laboratory for UA. Nephrologist A, blinded to the patient's clinical information, performed a UA on the other aliquot of urine, generated a report, and assigned the most likely diagnosis for ARF based on UA findings. Nephrologist B, also blinded to the clinical information, reviewed nephrologist A's UA reports and assigned a diagnosis for ARF to each report. Nephrologists A and B both assigned a diagnosis (or diagnoses) for the ARF based on laboratory UA results. These 4 sets of diagnoses were compared with those assigned by the consult nephrologists.
Results: Nephrologist A correctly diagnosed the cause of ARF in 24 of 26 samples (92.3% success rate) based on his performance of the UA. Diagnoses by nephrologists A and B, based on their review of the clinical laboratory UA report, were correct in only 23.1% and 19.2% of the samples, respectively. Accuracy of diagnosis for nephrologist B improved to 69.3% when she reviewed UA reports from nephrologist A. Nephrologist A's review of urine sediment was significantly more accurate than interpretations by nephrologist A or B of clinical laboratory reports (sign test, P < 0.001). Nephrologist A reported a greater number of renal tubular epithelial (RTE) cells (P < 0.0001), granular casts (P = 0.0017), hyaline casts (P = 0.0233), RTE casts (P = 0.0008), and dysmorphic red blood cells. The laboratory noted a greater number of squamous cells (P = 0.0034).
Conclusion: A nephrologist is more likely to recognize the presence of RTE cells, granular casts, RTE casts, and dysmorphic red blood cells in urine. The laboratory may be reporting RTE cells incorrectly as squamous epithelial cells. Nephrologist-performed UA is superior to laboratory-performed UA in determining the correct diagnosis.
Comment in
-
The role of nephrologists in teaching urinary sediment examination.Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Apr;47(4):713. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.01.022. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006. PMID: 16564951 No abstract available.
-
The diagnostic value of urine microscopy: a comparison of nephrologist- versus laboratory-based interpretation.J Nephrol. 2022 Dec;35(9):2429-2431. doi: 10.1007/s40620-022-01469-9. Epub 2022 Oct 26. J Nephrol. 2022. PMID: 36287380 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The Clinical Impact of Urinalysis Screened by Automated Microscopy Compared to Reference Manual Analysis.Am J Nephrol. 2025;56(2):178-186. doi: 10.1159/000541561. Epub 2024 Oct 16. Am J Nephrol. 2025. PMID: 39413744
-
Urine Sediment Examination in the Diagnosis and Management of Kidney Disease: Core Curriculum 2019.Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Feb;73(2):258-272. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Sep 21. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019. PMID: 30249419 Review.
-
The urine sediment as a biomarker of kidney disease.Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Nov;66(5):748-55. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.02.342. Epub 2015 May 2. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015. PMID: 25943719
-
Assessment of Interobserver Reliability of Nephrologist Examination of Urine Sediment.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2013959. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13959. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32821922 Free PMC article.
-
Cylindruria.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 Nov;53 Suppl 2:s1471-7. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0480. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015. PMID: 26079824 Review.
Cited by
-
The diagnostic value of urine microscopy: a comparison of nephrologist- versus laboratory-based interpretation.J Nephrol. 2022 Dec;35(9):2429-2431. doi: 10.1007/s40620-022-01469-9. Epub 2022 Oct 26. J Nephrol. 2022. PMID: 36287380 No abstract available.
-
Diagnostic Utility of Urine Microscopy in Kidney Diseases.Indian J Nephrol. 2024 May-Jun;34(3):213-221. doi: 10.25259/ijn_362_23. Epub 2024 May 28. Indian J Nephrol. 2024. PMID: 39114391 Free PMC article.
-
What should the characteristics and attributes of an accredited nephrology training programme be? Looking for high standards.Clin Kidney J. 2016 Feb;9(1):23-8. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfv134. Epub 2015 Dec 28. Clin Kidney J. 2016. PMID: 26798457 Free PMC article.
-
Urinary cytology: a potential tool for differential diagnosis of acute kidney injury in patients with nephrotic syndrome.BMC Res Notes. 2020 Aug 27;13(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05244-6. BMC Res Notes. 2020. PMID: 32854763 Free PMC article.
-
Presentation of the child with renal disease and guidelines for referral to the pediatric nephrologist.Int J Pediatr. 2012;2012:978673. doi: 10.1155/2012/978673. Epub 2012 May 28. Int J Pediatr. 2012. PMID: 22690227 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical