Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Nov;95(11):1964-9.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.047308.

State and metropolitan-area estimates of disability in the United States, 2001

Affiliations

State and metropolitan-area estimates of disability in the United States, 2001

Catherine A Okoro et al. Am J Public Health. 2005 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to provide estimates of disability prevalence for states and metropolitan areas in the United States.

Methods: We analyzed Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 2001 for all 50 states and the District of Columbia and 103 metropolitan areas. We performed stratified analyses by demographics for 20 metropolitan areas with the highest prevalence of disability.

Results: State disability estimates ranged from 10.5% in Hawaii to 25.9% in Arizona. Metropolitan disability estimates ranged from 10.2% in Honolulu, Hawaii to 27.1% in Tucson, Ariz. Regional metropolitan medians for disability (range, 17.0-19.7%) were similar across the Northeast, Midwest, and South and were highest in the West. In the 20 metropolitan areas with the highest disability estimates, the prevalence of disability generally increased with age and was higher for women and those with a high-school education or less.

Conclusions: State and metropolitan-area estimates may be used to guide state and local efforts to prevent, delay, or reduce disability and secondary conditions in persons with disabilities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Unadjusted prevalence of disability by state and metropolitan statistical area (MSA), 2001.

References

    1. Waldrop J, Stern SM. Disability Status: 2000. Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census; 2003. Report No. C2KBR-17. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/c2kbr-17.pdf. Accessed May 25, 2004.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults—United States, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50:120–125. - PubMed
    1. Congressional Budget Office. Projections of Expenditures for Long-Term Care Services for the Elderly. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office; 1999. Available at: http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdoc.cfm?index=1123&type=1. Accessed May 25, 2004.
    1. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2000.
    1. Lollar DJ, Crews JE. Redefining the role of public health in disability. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24: 195–208. - PubMed