Influence of body reserves and eye opacity on foraging behaviours of tiger snakes
- PMID: 16254914
- DOI: 10.1002/jez.a.229
Influence of body reserves and eye opacity on foraging behaviours of tiger snakes
Abstract
Physiological states such as reproductive stage, parasite load, body condition, and environmental conditions, influence behaviours in complex ways. According to the Clark's asset-protection principle (Clark, 1994. Behav Ecol 5:159-170), individuals in good body condition take fewer predation risks than conspecifics in lesser condition. In many ectotherms, foraging, digestion, and moulting require an elevation of the metabolism achieved through intensive basking, thereby increasing the risk of being detected by predators. Using four experimental groups of snakes, we showed that two independent physiological states, (1) the presence of prey in the stomach and (2) eye opacity associated with moulting, increase predator vulnerability. In a parallel experiment, two groups of snakes were maintained on contrasting diets (high food intake vs. low food intake) for 6 months. Apart from sloughing periods, most individuals (89%) accepted their meal irrespective of food treatment. Consequently, well-fed snakes exhibited higher body condition (one third physiological state) relative to less-fed individuals. During sloughing events, however, well-fed individuals often refused (78%) to eat while the less-fed individuals readily accepted (86%) their meal despite eye opacity. Individuals with less body reserves accepted the cumulative risks owing to eye opacity and stomach fullness. By contrast, well-fed snakes remained more "prudent" (i.e., exhibited behaviours that depended on their internal state). Our results show that snakes can adjust their foraging "decision" by combining different physiological informations.
Similar articles
-
A combination of body condition measurements is more informative than conventional condition indices: temporal variation in body condition and corticosterone in brown tree snakes (Boiga irregularis).Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2008 Feb 1;155(3):607-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Aug 24. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2008. PMID: 17897644
-
Evolutionary biology: adaptive developmental plasticity in snakes.Nature. 2004 Sep 16;431(7006):261-2. doi: 10.1038/431261a. Nature. 2004. PMID: 15372019
-
Tail loss, body condition and swimming performances in tiger snakes, Notechis ater occidentalis.J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol. 2005 Oct 1;303(10):894-903. doi: 10.1002/jez.a.218. J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol. 2005. PMID: 16161008
-
Functional and numerical responses of predators: where do vipers fit in the traditional paradigms?Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008 Nov;83(4):601-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00056.x. Epub 2008 Oct 20. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008. PMID: 18947336 Review.
-
Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009 Aug;84(3):485-513. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00085.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009. PMID: 19659887 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources