Safe scanning, but frequent artifacts mimicking bradycardia and tachycardia during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with an implantable loop recorder (ILR)
- PMID: 16255749
- PMCID: PMC6932005
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2005.00056.x
Safe scanning, but frequent artifacts mimicking bradycardia and tachycardia during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with an implantable loop recorder (ILR)
Abstract
Background: Patients with implantable devices are generally not permitted to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) because of potentially deleterious interactions. Little has been reported regarding the safety and effects of MRI scanning of patients with implantable loop recorders (ILRs). We evaluated the safety of scanning patients with ILRs and the output of the ILR after undergoing MRI.
Methods: Ten patients underwent 11 MRI scanning events. All patients had Reveal Plus (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) ILRs. Seven cranial, two lumbar-spine, one shoulder, and one knee MRI were performed. All of the MRIs were performed with the understanding that the patient had an ILR. In each patient, the ILR was cleared moments before the scan and the integrity of the signal and time date stamp were verified. The devices were reinterrogated immediately after MRI in 10 patients and two days post MR scanning in one patient. Each patient was questioned post MRI regarding any symptoms experienced during the scan.
Results: Both tachy and bradyarrhythmias appeared as artifacts as a result of ILR exposure to MRI. Post MRI, none of the ILRs showed diminished signal integrity, altered programmed parameters, diminished battery status, inability to communicate or be reprogrammed. No sensations of tugging or warmth at the implant site were noted.
Conclusion: MRI was performed in ILR patients without harm to the patient or permanent damage to the ILR. MRI scanning of the Reveal appears safe. Artifact mimicking an arrhythmia was common, however, and must be excluded in any ILR patient undergoing MRI to avoid mistakenly attributing a syncopal episode, or palpitations to the artifacts produced from MRI exposure.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with an Implantable Loop Recorder.Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016 May;21(3):319-324. doi: 10.1111/anec.12333. Epub 2015 Dec 24. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016. PMID: 26701418 Free PMC article.
-
Breast MRI in patients with implantable loop recorder: initial experience.Eur Radiol. 2024 Jan;34(1):155-164. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10025-3. Epub 2023 Aug 9. Eur Radiol. 2024. PMID: 37555957 Free PMC article.
-
Artefact mimicking tachycardia during magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with an implantable loop recorder.Heart. 2003 Mar;89(3):e10. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.3.e10. Heart. 2003. PMID: 12591861 Free PMC article.
-
Multimodality imaging in patients with implantable loop recorders: Tips and tricks.Hellenic J Cardiol. 2024 May-Jun;77:93-105. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2023.12.001. Epub 2023 Dec 12. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38096953 Review.
-
Implantable diagnostic monitoring devices for evaluation of syncope, and tachy- and brady-arrhythmias.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003 Oct;9(2):137-44. doi: 10.1023/a:1026220020639. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003. PMID: 14574024 Review.
Cited by
-
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with an Implantable Loop Recorder.Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016 May;21(3):319-324. doi: 10.1111/anec.12333. Epub 2015 Dec 24. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016. PMID: 26701418 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: a review of the dangers and difficulties in MR scanning and attempts to improve safety.Insights Imaging. 2017 Aug;8(4):405-418. doi: 10.1007/s13244-017-0556-3. Epub 2017 Jun 17. Insights Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28624970 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Inappropriate asystole detection in early postoperative phase after loop recorder implantation.ISRN Cardiol. 2011;2011:146062. doi: 10.5402/2011/146062. Epub 2011 Apr 17. ISRN Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 22347628 Free PMC article.
-
MRI in patients with cardiac devices.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2007 Mar;9(1):63-71. doi: 10.1007/s11886-007-0012-y. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2007. PMID: 17362687 Review.
-
MRI and cardiac implantable electronic devices; current status and required safety conditions.Neth Heart J. 2014 Jun;22(6):269-76. doi: 10.1007/s12471-014-0544-x. Neth Heart J. 2014. PMID: 24733688 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Krahn AD, Klein GJ, Skanes AC, et al Insertable loop recorder use for detection of intermittent arrhythmias. (Review) Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004;27(5):657–664. - PubMed
-
- Constantine G, Shan K, Flamm SD, et al Role of MRI in clinical cardiology. (Review) Lancet 2004;363(9427):2162–2171. - PubMed
-
- Shellock FG, Tkach JA, Ruggieri PM, et al Cardiac pacemakers, ICDs, and loop recorder: Evaluation of translational attraction using conventional (“long‐bore”) and “short‐bore” 1.5‐ and 3.0‐Tesla MR systems. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003;5(2):387–397. - PubMed
-
- De Cock CC, Spruijt HJ, Van Campen LM, et al Electromagnetic interference of an implantable loop recorder by commonly encountered electronic devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23(10 Pt 1):1516–1518. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical