Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Oct;10(4):409-13.
doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2005.00057.x.

Effects of mobile telephones on the function of implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effects of mobile telephones on the function of implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Izzet Tandogan et al. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2005 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: We investigated whether mobile telephones affect the function of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).

Background: It is well known that electromagnetic fields can affect medical devices.

Methods: The study included 43 patients with ventricular tachycardia and/or fibrillation treated with transvenous pectoral ICDs. Testing was done under continuous electrocardiograph monitoring under supervision of an ICD programmer. Initially, each patient was tested during spontaneous rhythm. Then the ICD was programmed to a pace rhythm higher than the patient's heart rate, and the tests were repeated at paced rhythm. In 7 patients, tests were performed during the implantation procedure as well. In 3 of the patients, only a single defibrillation zone was active. The other 40 patients had one or more active ventricular tachycardia zones. Two mobile phones (both GSM 900 MHz) were positioned 50 cm away from the implanted device in opposite directions and switched on. Communication was established between these phones, two investigators had a 20-second conversation, and then the phones were switched off. The same procedure was repeated at 30, 20, and 10 cm away from the implantation site, respectively. Finally, the procedure was performed with the antennae of both phones touching the device pocket. In the above-mentioned 7 cases where testing was done during implantation of the ICD, a call was made from one phone to the other, ringing occurred for 5 seconds, and then two investigators conversed while the device was implanted.

Results: There was no change in the function of the ICDs during any of the phone testing procedures. In 5 cases, artifacts were noted on the surface electrocardiographic (ECG) screen of the programmer during the tests, but no such changes were observed on the simultaneous intracardiac ECGs.

Conclusion: The results of the study suggest that mobile phones have no effects on ICD function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The programmer electrocardiogram (top trace) of one ICD recipient (Patient 40) showed artifacts (indicated by arrows) while the one mobile phone was ringing, and while the investigators were communicating over the two phones (→). The simultaneous intracardiac electrocardiogram revealed no artifacts. The artifacts disappeared when the mobile phones were switched off (→).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hayes DL, Carrillo RG, Findlay GK, et al State of the science: Pacemaker and defibrillator interference from wireless communication devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996;19: 1419–1430. - PubMed
    1. Hanada E, Watanabe Y, Antoku Y, et al Hospital construction materials: Poor shielding capacity with respect to signals transmitted by mobile telephones. Biomed Instrum Technol 1998;32: 489–496. - PubMed
    1. May CD, Smith PR, Murdock CJ, et al The impact of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator on quality‐of‐life. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1995;18: 1411–1418. - PubMed
    1. Groh WJ, Boschee SA, Engelstein ED, et al Interactions between electronic article surveillance systems and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators. Circulation 1999;100: 387–392. - PubMed
    1. Vlay SC. Fish pond electromagnetic interference resulting in an inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25: 1532. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms