Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Dec;95(12):2144-54.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.048397. Epub 2005 Oct 27.

The changing fate of pneumonia as a public health concern in 20th-century America and beyond

Affiliations

The changing fate of pneumonia as a public health concern in 20th-century America and beyond

Scott H Podolsky. Am J Public Health. 2005 Dec.

Abstract

For a brief period from the 1930s through the early 1940s, public health advocates made pneumonia a leading public health concern. Predicated on the need for antipneumococcal antiserum, but also incorporating physician reeducation, state "pneumonia control programs" were established nationwide. However, with the advent of penicillin and the sulfonamides, the pneumonia control programs soon collapsed. Pneumonia reverted to the domain of the private practitioner, which was devoid of state oversight. With the emergence of pneumococcal antibiotic resistance in the 1990s, the possibility again arose that pneumonia could become a public health concern, given the nationwide need to curb unnecessary antibiotic usage and to encourage vaccination. An understanding of the history of pneumonia's changing status could shed light on current attempts to reformulate the disease and elucidate the contested domains of private practice and public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Despite the ascent of chronic diseases such as heart disease and cancer to become the nation’s leading causes of death by the late 1930s, pneumonia remained the leading infectious cause of death in the nation. Illustration from 1940 US Public Health Service brochure.
FIGURE 2—
FIGURE 2—
Pneumonia was explicitly reformulated as an “emergency” in the 1930s, as pressing as appendicitis, to which it was often compared. Illustration from 1940 US Public Health Service brochure.
FIGURE 3—
FIGURE 3—
Given the logistics of serotherapy, the treatment of the individual patient was transformed into a “community” responsibility. Illustration from 1940 US Public Health Service brochure.
FIGURE 4—
FIGURE 4—
In an era of intense resistance to encroachment by the American Medical Association on the private practitioner’s domain, the US Public Health Service attempted to portray its role as one of friendly guide, rather than usurper of practice. Illustration from 1940 US Public Health Service brochure.

References

    1. See Pneumonia: Mortality and Measures for Prevention (Washington, DC: US Treasury Department and US Public Health Service, 1938); “Parran Urges Funds for War on Pneumonia,” Washington Post, November 13, 1937; “Progress of Programs for Pneumonia Control,” Bulletin of Lederle Laboratories 6 (1938): 118–119.
    1. For earlier assessments of pneumonia’s brief transformation into a national public health concern, see Harry F. Dowling, “Frustration and Foundation: Management of Pneumonia Before Antibiotics,” Journal of the American Medical Association 220 (1972): 1341–1345; Harry F. Dowling, “The Rise and Fall of Pneumonia-Control Programs,” Journal of Infectious Diseases 127 (1973): 201–206. - PubMed
    1. Osler William, The Principles and Practice of Medicine (New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1892), 529.
    1. Klemperer G. and F. Klemperer, “Versuche uber Immunisiring und Heilung bei der Pneumokokkeninfection,” Berlin Klinische Wochenschrift 28 (1891): 833–835; as discussed in Edwin A. Locke, “The Serological Treatment of Lobar Pneumonia,” Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 190 (1924): 196–203.
    1. Dochez A. R. and L. J. Gillespie, “A Biologic Classification of Pneumococci by Means of Immunity Reactions,” Journal of the American Medical Association 61 (1913): 727–730. Cole had been influenced in this regard through visiting Fred Neufeld’s laboratory in Berlin, where Neufeld had already begun such subclassification. See Rufus Cole to F. Neufeld, April 22, 1910; F. Neufeld to Rufus Cole, April 3, 1912; both in the Rufus Cole Papers, American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia (hereafter called RCP). Regarding parallel efforts by F. Spencer Lister in South Africa at the time, see Robert Austrian, “Of Gold and Pneumococci: A History of Pneumococcal Vaccines in South Africa,” Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association 89 (1977): 141–161. Regarding the prevalence of pneumococci as agents of lobar pneumonia, see Oswald T. Avery, H. T. Chickering, Rufus Cole, and A. R. Dochez, Acute Lobar Pneumonia: Prevention and Serum Treatment (New York: Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, 1917), 7.

Publication types