Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jun;65(6):809-15.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.036988. Epub 2005 Nov 3.

The incidences of and consultation rate for lower extremity complaints in general practice

J M van der Waal  1 , S D M Bot, C B Terwee, D A W M van der Windt, F G Schellevis, L M Bouter, J Dekker
Affiliations

The incidences of and consultation rate for lower extremity complaints in general practice

J M van der Waal et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the incidence and consultation rate of lower extremity complaints in general practice.

Methods: Data were obtained from the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice, in which 195 general practitioners (GPs) in 104 practices recorded all contacts with patients during 12 consecutive months in computerised patient records. GPs classified the symptoms and diagnosis for each patient at each consultation according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC). Incidence densities and consultation rates for different complaints were calculated.

Results: During the registration period 63.2 GP consultations per 1000 person-years were attributable to a new complaint of the lower extremities. Highest incidence densities were seen for knee complaints: 21.4 per 1000 person-years for women and 22.8 per 1000 person-years for men. The incidence of most lower extremity complaints was higher for women than for men and higher in older age.

Conclusions: Both incidences of and consultation rates for lower extremity complaints are substantial in general practice. This implies a considerable impact on the workload of the GP.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Elliott A M, Smith B H, Penny K I, Smith W C, Chambers W A. The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community. Lancet 19993541248–1252. - PubMed
    1. Straaton K V, Fine P R. Addressing work disability through vocational rehabilitation services. Bull Rheum Dis 1997461–3. - PubMed
    1. Hoffman C, Rice D, Sung H Y. Persons with chronic conditions. Their prevalence and costs. JAMA 19962761473–1479. - PubMed
    1. Odding E, Valkenburg H A, Algra D, Vandenouweland F A, Grobbee D E, Hofman A. Association of locomotor complaints and disability in the Rotterdam Study. Ann Rheum Dis 199554721–725. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Picavet H S, Schouten J S. Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)‐Study. Pain 2003102167–178. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms