Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Dec;Suppl(Suppl 1):2-10.
doi: 10.1007/s10198-005-0312-3.

Defining the "Health Benefit Basket" in nine European countries. Evidence from the European Union Health BASKET Project

Affiliations
Review

Defining the "Health Benefit Basket" in nine European countries. Evidence from the European Union Health BASKET Project

J Schreyögg et al. Eur J Health Econ. 2005 Dec.

Abstract

This article identifies and analyses a framework for "health baskets," the taxonomy of benefit catalogues for curative services, and the criteria for the in- or exclusion of benefits in nine EU member states (Denmark, England, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, Poland and Spain). Focusing on services of curative care, it is found that the explicitness of benefit catalogues varies largely between the countries. In the absence of explicitly defined benefit catalogues, in- and outpatient remuneration schemes have the character of benefit catalogues. The criteria for the in- or exclusion into benefit catalogues are often not transparent and (cost-)effectiveness is applied only for certain sectors. An EU-wide harmonization of benefit baskets does not seem realistic in the short or medium term as the variation in criteria and the taxonomies of benefit catalogues are large but not insurmountable. There may be scope for a European core basket.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Three dimensions of coverage

References

    1. Busse R, Wismar M, Berman P (2002) The European Union and health services—the impact of the single European market on member states. IOS: Amsterdam
    1. Palm W, Nickless J, Lewalle H, Coheur A (2000) Implications of recent jurispuridence on the co-ordination of health care protection systems. General report produced for the Directorate-General for Employment and Social Affairs of the European Commission. Association Internationale de la Mutualité: Brussels
    1. Johnson S, Kuhlmann R, and the EPCAT Group (2000) The European Service Mapping Schedule (ESMS): development of an instrument for the description and classification of mental health services. Acta Psychiatr Scand 102:14–23 - PubMed
    1. Kupsch S, Kern A, Klas C, Kressin B, Vienonen M, Beske F (2000) Health service provision on a microcosmic level—an international comparison; results of a WHO/IGSF survey in 15 European countries. Institute for Health Systems Research: Kiel
    1. OECD (2002) Measuring up: improving health system performance in OECD countries. Proceedings of the Ottawa Conference. OECD: Paris

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources