A comparison and evaluation of the predictions of relational and conjunctive accounts of hippocampal function
- PMID: 16270317
- DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20131
A comparison and evaluation of the predictions of relational and conjunctive accounts of hippocampal function
Abstract
Relational and conjunctive memory theory each postulate that the hippocampus participates in the formation of long-term memory representations comprised of associations between multiple elements. The goals of the current work were to clarify and contrast these theories by outlining the nature of the representations that are spared vs. impaired following hippocampal damage according to each theoretical perspective. Relational theory predicts that hippocampal lesions will impair performance on tasks that require the formation of new long-term representations in which distinct elements must be regarded in relation to all other elements. Representations that remain intact despite hippocampal damage include separate representations of distinct individual elements or multiple stimuli fused into a static "blend" such as several elements viewed from one vantage point. Additionally, the relational account predicts that rapid incidental online processing of the relations can be achieved through structures other than the hippocampus, but this information will not be stored. In contrast, conjunctive theory predicts that hippocampal damage will impair the rapid formation of unitary representations that contain features of elements and their relative relationships bound in an inflexible manner. Deficits in the rapid formation of these conjunctive representations result in impaired performance on tasks that require rapid incidental stimulus binding. However, intact formation of conjunctive representations can occur over multiple trials in the service of problem solving. Using these theoretical frameworks, recent findings from the human and nonhuman animal literature are reexamined in order to determine whether one theory better accounts for current findings. We discuss empirical studies that serve as "critical experiments" in addressing the relational vs. conjunctive debate, and find that the predictions of relational theory are supported by existing findings over those from the conjunctive account.
Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Similar articles
-
[Hippocampus as interaction sites between cerebral memory systems].C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1994;188(5-6):459-67. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1994. PMID: 7780789 French.
-
Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: a computational theory.Hippocampus. 1993 Oct;3(4):491-516. doi: 10.1002/hipo.450030410. Hippocampus. 1993. PMID: 8269040
-
Hippocampal place cells, context, and episodic memory.Hippocampus. 2006;16(9):716-29. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20208. Hippocampus. 2006. PMID: 16897724 Review.
-
Cortico-hippocampal interaction and adaptive stimulus representation: a neurocomputational theory of associative learning and memory.Neural Netw. 2005 Nov;18(9):1265-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2005.08.003. Epub 2005 Nov 4. Neural Netw. 2005. PMID: 16275027
-
Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: principles of cortical and hippocampal function.Psychol Rev. 2001 Apr;108(2):311-45. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.311. Psychol Rev. 2001. PMID: 11381832 Review.
Cited by
-
Shared Functions of Perirhinal and Parahippocampal Cortices: Implications for Cognitive Aging.Trends Neurosci. 2018 Jun;41(6):349-359. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 16. Trends Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29555181 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patients with hippocampal amnesia cannot imagine new experiences.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 30;104(5):1726-31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610561104. Epub 2007 Jan 17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007. PMID: 17229836 Free PMC article.
-
The focus of attention as observed in visual working memory tasks: making sense of competing claims.Neuropsychologia. 2011 May;49(6):1401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.035. Epub 2011 Jan 26. Neuropsychologia. 2011. PMID: 21277880 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neural distinctiveness and reinstatement of hippocampal representations support unitization for associations.Brain Res. 2023 Jan 1;1798:148143. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148143. Epub 2022 Nov 1. Brain Res. 2023. PMID: 36328066 Free PMC article.
-
Subliminal encoding and flexible retrieval of objects in scenes.Hippocampus. 2018 Sep;28(9):633-643. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22957. Epub 2018 May 17. Hippocampus. 2018. PMID: 29704287 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical