Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Aug;40(8):606-10.

[Cancer and surgical treatment impact the quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer]

[Article in Chinese]
Xue Bian  1 , Zhen-gang Xu, Chun-mei Lu, Ping-zhang Tang, Jian Luo
Affiliations
  • PMID: 16270881

[Cancer and surgical treatment impact the quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer]

[Article in Chinese]
Xue Bian et al. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate head and neck cancer and surgical treatment impact the quality of life (QOL).

Methods: In this study, 49 cases of head and neck cancer patients were recruited. Among them, 27 cases were laryngeal cancer, 14 cases were tongue cancer and 8 patients were recurrence of nasal pharyngeal cancer after radical radiotherapy. To demonstrate the cancer in different sites of the head and neck impact QOL of the patients in a different way and cancer impact QOL on the physical well-being, social family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being of the patients and quality of life (QOL) changed in different time-point before and after operation, QOL was assessed before surgical treatment and at 1,6 months after operation by means of a performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients (PSS-HN) and the functional assessment of cancer therapy head and neck (FACT-H&N) questionnaire.

Results: QOL deteriorated significantly in head and neck cancer patients. Cancer in different sites impact on QOL differently especially in patients with tongue cancer (PSS-HN P = 0.0361, FACT-H&N P = 0.0487). Head and neck cancer impact QOL on the physical well-being, social family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being of the patients in FACT-H&N questionnaire especially for emotional well-being domains (F = 2.78, P = 0.0311). The QOL in patients deteriorated by surgical treatment and it could be improved following the time. At the 6 months after operation it nearly reached the same scores that assessed before the operation (PSS-HN t = 2.03, P = 0.1120 FACT-H&N t = 1.03, P = 0.1180). Different surgical approaches and different reconstruction methods have different impact on QOL for patients. Laryngeal cancer patients with partial laryngectomy were 107.20 in FACT-H&N while total laryngectomees were 97. 71 at the 6 months after operation, with statistically difference (t = 3.02, P = 0.0430). Tongue cancer patients without reconstruction were 119. 24 in FACT-H&N while the others with reconstruction were 111.39 at the 6 months after operation (t = 3.00, P = 0.0472).

Conclusions: The QOL in head and neck cancer patients can be assessed by the questionnaire and it can be improved by selecting treatment regimen, surgical approaches and reconstructive methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types