Similar articles

• Systematic reviews and their application to research in speech and language therapy: a response to T. R. Pring's 'Ask a silly question: two decades of troublesome trials' (2004).

  Garrett Z, Thomas J. Garrett Z, et al. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006 Jan-Feb;41(1):95-105. doi: 10.1080/13682820500071542. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006. PMID: 16272005 Review.
• Getting started in research: systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

  Kisely S, Chang A, Crowe J, Galletly C, Jenkins P, Loi S, Looi JC, Macfarlane MD, McVie N, Parker S, Power B, Siskind D, Smith G, Merry S, Macfarlane S. Kisely S, et al. Australas Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;23(1):16-21. doi: 10.1177/1039856214562077. Epub 2014 Dec 11. Australas Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 25504401
• [Evaluation of methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool for the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews)].

  Coenen M, Schuetz GM, Dewey M. Coenen M, et al. Rofo. 2013 Sep;184(10):937-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350140. Epub 2013 Sep 2. Rofo. 2013. PMID: 23999778 German. No abstract available.
• Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness.

  Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Stephenson M, Aromataris E. Tufanaru C, et al. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):196-207. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000065. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015. PMID: 26355603
• An analysis of systematic reviews undertaken on standard advanced wound dressings in the last 10 years.

  Horkan L, Stansfield G, Miller M. Horkan L, et al. J Wound Care. 2009 Jul;18(7):298-304. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.7.43113. J Wound Care. 2009. PMID: 19827483 Review.