Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Jul;6(7):549-56.

Functional assessment of coronary atherosclerosis in the catheterization laboratory: the key role of fractional flow reserve

Affiliations
  • PMID: 16274016
Review

Functional assessment of coronary atherosclerosis in the catheterization laboratory: the key role of fractional flow reserve

Emanuele Barbato et al. Ital Heart J. 2005 Jul.

Abstract

Patients with suspected coronary artery disease often undergo coronary angiography without prior non-invasive functional stress testing, mainly because of logistic reasons, shortcomings of the non-invasive tests, and a more widespread confidence in invasive techniques. The availability in the catheterization laboratory of the pressure-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) has provided the interventional cardiologist with the ideal tool for appropriate decision-making based on the functional significance of the coronary stenosis detected at the angiogram. In fact, FFR allows a more refined and individualized understanding of the true severity of coronary artery disease, and, therefore, a more appropriate selection of the epicardial lesions to be treated, especially in patients with dubious lesions and complex disease. A clinical decision-making based on coronary pressure measurement results in a more effective strategy than placing stents on a "trial and error" basis. This is particularly true in case of drug-eluting stents where an approach based on an indiscriminate multi-stenting will annihilate the benefits of these new stents and be unacceptably expensive. In addition, many angiographically mild stenoses happen to be hemodynamically significant and, therefore, deserve revascularization, especially in the drug-eluting stent era.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources