Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005;23(11):1143-53.
doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523110-00006.

Eliciting social preference weights for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung health states

Affiliations

Eliciting social preference weights for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung health states

Paul Kind et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005.

Abstract

Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) is a multidimensional measure of quality of life developed for use in the evaluation of interventions in lung cancer.

Objective: To develop a set of utility weights that could be used to convert FACT-L into a single index capable of being used in the economic analysis of clinical trial data.

Method: A core set of FACT-L items were valued in two versions of a 14-page postal survey of over 400 members of the UK general population. Respondents valued hypothetical FACT-L health states using a scale from 0 to 100 (worst to best health state). Respondents also valued their own health using the standard form of the EuroQol EQ-5D. Data were entered into an ordinary least squares regression model.

Results: Item weights estimated in regression analysis yielded values for 10 items from the FACT-L. The summary index based on this selected set of FACT-L items has a maximum value of 0.703 and a minimum value of 0.111.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates a practical method of converting a standard condition-specific measure into a form that has the requisite properties to legitimise its use in cost-utility analysis. The methodology used here is not unique to FACT-L and might be considered appropriate for use in converting similar instruments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-72 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Cancer. 2001 Jun;37(9):1081-8 - PubMed
    1. Health Technol Assess. 2004 Apr;8(13):iii, ix-x, 1-91 - PubMed
    1. J Surg Res. 2003 Sep;114(1):1-5 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Mar;11(3):570-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources