Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Oct;11(4):617-30.
doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0029-9.

Using electronic discussion boards to teach responsible conduct of research

Affiliations

Using electronic discussion boards to teach responsible conduct of research

David B Resnik. Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Oct.

Abstract

This study presents the results of a survey of student satisfaction with electronic discussion boards in a course on the responsible conduct of research (RCR). On a 1-5 scale, the respondents stated that the use of the electronic discussion board was an effective teaching tool (4.71), that it enabled them to get feedback from their peers (4.43), that it helped promote discussion and debate (4.36), that it helped them learn how to analyze ethical dilemmas in research (4.36), and that they would consider using an electronic discussion board, if they ever taught a course themselves (4.76). In their written comments, the respondents indicated that electronic discussion boards are a convenient way of promoting debate and in-depth discussion. These results suggest, but do not prove, that discussion boards can promote debate and discussion in courses on research ethics. Instructors who teach RCR should consider using electronic discussion boards in regular or online courses, and they should consider studying the effectiveness of electronic discussion boards in research ethics education. Although electronic discussion boards cannot replace the face-to-face interaction that occurs in a classroom setting, they may provide a useful medium for the exchange of ideas and opinions online.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):1403-17 - PubMed
    1. Br Dent J. 2004 Jul 24;197(2):95-7 - PubMed
    1. Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Jul;11(3):329-40 - PubMed
    1. Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Jul;11(3):435-46; discussion 447-9 - PubMed

Publication types