Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005;9(6):R645-52.
doi: 10.1186/cc3821. Epub 2005 Oct 6.

Mortality prediction using SAPS II: an update for French intensive care units

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Mortality prediction using SAPS II: an update for French intensive care units

Jean Roger Le Gall et al. Crit Care. 2005.

Abstract

Introduction: The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) is commonly used for benchmarking intensive care units (ICUs). Available mortality prediction models are outdated and must be adapted to current populations of interest. The objective of this study was to improve the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II for mortality prediction in ICUs, thereby improving SMR estimates.

Method: A retrospective data base study was conducted in patients hospitalized in 106 French ICUs between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 1999. A total of 77,490 evaluable admissions were split into a training set and a validation set. Calibration and discrimination were determined for the original SAPS II, a customized SAPS II and an expanded SAPS II developed in the training set by adding six admission variables: age, sex, length of pre-ICU hospital stay, patient location before ICU, clinical category and whether drug overdose was present. The training set was used for internal validation and the validation set for external validation.

Results: With the original SAPS II calibration was poor, with marked underestimation of observed mortality, whereas discrimination was good (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.858). Customization improved calibration but had poor uniformity of fit; discrimination was unchanged. The expanded SAPS II exhibited good calibration, good uniformity of fit and better discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.879). The SMR in the validation set was 1.007 (confidence interval 0.985-1.028). Some ICUs had better and others worse performance with the expanded SAPS II than with the customized SAPS II.

Conclusion: The original SAPS II model did not perform sufficiently well to be useful for benchmarking in France. Customization improved the statistical qualities of the model but gave poor uniformity of fit. Adding simple variables to create an expanded SAPS II model led to better calibration, discrimination and uniformity of fit, producing a tool suitable for benchmarking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ICU performance as assessed using the three SAPS II models. Shown are standardized mortality ratio (SMR) values for 16 units with more than 300 patients, using either the original, the expanded, or the customized Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II. A–P indicate different intensive care units (ICUs).

Comment in

References

    1. Le Gall JR, Loirat P. Can we evaluate the performance of an intensive care unit? Curr Opin Crit Care. 1995;1:219–220.
    1. Ridley S. Severity of illness scoring systems and performance appraisal. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:1185–1194. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00615.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lemeshow S, Le Gall JR. Modeling the severity of illness of ICU patients. A system update. JAMA. 1994;272:1049–1055. doi: 10.1001/jama.272.13.1049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiologic Score (SAPS II) based on an European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993;270:2957–2963. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.24.2957. Correction: JAMA 1994, 271:1321. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glance LG, Osler TM, Dick A. Rating the quality of intensive care units: is it a function of the intensive care unit scoring system? Crit Care Med. 2002;30:1976–1982. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200209000-00005. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources