Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2005 Nov 10:6:57.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-57.

Manipulative therapy and/or NSAIDs for acute low back pain: design of a randomized controlled trial [ACTRN012605000036617]

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Manipulative therapy and/or NSAIDs for acute low back pain: design of a randomized controlled trial [ACTRN012605000036617]

Mark J Hancock et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Acute low back pain is a common condition resulting in pain and disability. Current national and international guidelines advocate general practitioner care including advice and paracetamol (4 g daily in otherwise well adults) as the first line of care for people with acute low back pain. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) are advocated in many guidelines as second line management options for patients with acute low back pain who are not recovering. No studies have explored the role of NSAIDs and/or SMT in addition to first line management for acute low back pain. The primary aim of this study is to investigate if NSAIDs and/or SMT in addition to general practitioner advice and paracetamol results in shorter recovery times for patients with acute low back pain. The secondary aims of the study are to evaluate whether the addition of SMT and/or NSAIDs influences pain, disability and global perceived effect at 1, 2, 4 and 12 weeks after onset of therapy for patients with significant acute low back pain.

Methods/design: This paper presents the rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial examining the addition of NSAIDs and/or SMT in 240 people who present to their general practitioner with significant acute low back pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Walker BF. The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. Journal of Spinal Disorders. 2000;13:205–217. doi: 10.1097/00002517-200006000-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Australia's health 2000: the seventh biennial health report of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Canberra, AIHW; 2000.
    1. Pengel LHM, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Refshauge KM. Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis. BMJ. 2003;327:323. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7410.323. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, Kim Burton A, Waddell G. Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine. 2001;26:2504–13; discussion 2513-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200111150-00022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group . Evidence-Based Management of Acute Musculoskeletal Pain - A guide for clinicians. Bowen Hills, Australian Academic Press; 2003.

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources