Phallic preserving surgery in patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis
- PMID: 16280767
- DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000181225.31468.82
Phallic preserving surgery in patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis
Abstract
Purpose: Standard surgical methods to eradicate invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis often result in significant deformities. Wide local excision with skin grafting in select cases results in the preservation of normal phallic appearance and function.
Materials and methods: Seven patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis were treated with wide excision and resurfaced by 1 of 3 methods, namely 1) a split-thickness graft, 2) a full-thickness graft or 3) shaft skin advancement.
Results: At 1 to 5 years of followup there was 1 local recurrence proximal to the original resection site. Local excision of recurrence resulted in no evidence of disease at 2 years of followup following repeat excision. All other patients had no local recurrence.
Conclusions: In select cases wide local excision with grafting or skin advancement results in a normal phallic appearance without jeopardizing cancer control.
Comment in
-
Re: phallic preserving surgery in patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 1):1687-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.059. J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16952715 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Re: phallic preserving surgery in patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 1):1687-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.059. J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16952715 No abstract available.
-
Multi-institutional long-term experience with conservative surgery for invasive penile carcinoma.J Urol. 2003 Feb;169(2):500-2. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000043808.58188.52. J Urol. 2003. PMID: 12544296
-
Penis conserving treatment for T1 and T2 penile carcinoma: clinical implications of a local recurrence.J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):575-80; discussion 580. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.063. J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16813892
-
Reconstructive surgery of the penis.Curr Opin Urol. 2006 Nov;16(6):396-400. doi: 10.1097/01.mou.0000250278.44990.4f. Curr Opin Urol. 2006. PMID: 17053518 Review.
-
Management of recurrent penile cancer following partial or total penectomy.Urol Clin North Am. 1994 Nov;21(4):729-37. Urol Clin North Am. 1994. PMID: 7974901 Review.
Cited by
-
Sexual function after surgical treatment for penile cancer: Which organ-sparing approach gives the best results?Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Jul-Aug;9(7-8):E423-7. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2801. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015. PMID: 26279710 Free PMC article.
-
Organ Preservation Surgery for Carcinoma Penis.Indian J Surg Oncol. 2017 Mar;8(1):59-63. doi: 10.1007/s13193-016-0573-6. Epub 2016 Dec 20. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28127184 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intraoperative frozen section examination for penile cancer surgery: a systematic review.Int J Impot Res. 2025 Feb 11. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01024-7. Online ahead of print. Int J Impot Res. 2025. PMID: 39934247 Review.
-
Current concepts of organ-sparing surgery in penile cancer.Arab J Urol. 2011 Jun;9(2):121-2. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.06.012. Epub 2011 Aug 4. Arab J Urol. 2011. PMID: 26579280 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Venous thrombosis, multiple carcinomatous foci and differences in metastatic pathways of penile carcinoma.Oncol Lett. 2023 Jan 17;25(3):88. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.13674. eCollection 2023 Mar. Oncol Lett. 2023. PMID: 36817041 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources