Skin-sensitizing and irritant properties of propylene glycol
- PMID: 16283903
- DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00693.x
Skin-sensitizing and irritant properties of propylene glycol
Abstract
In the several publications reviewed in this article, propylene glycol (PG; 1,2-propylene glycol) is described as a very weak contact sensitizer, if at all. However, particular exposures to PG-containing products might be associated with an elevated risk of sensitization. To identify such exposures, we analysed patch test data of 45 138 patients who have been tested with 20% PG in water between 1992 and 2002. Out of these, 1044 patients (2.3%) tested positively, 1083 showed a doubtful, follicular or erythematous reaction (2.4%) and 271 explicit irritant reactions (0.6%). This profile of patch test reactions is indicative of a slightly irritant preparation, and thus, many of the 'weak positive' reactions must probably be interpreted as false positive. No private or occupational exposures associated with an increased risk of PG sensitization were identified, except for lower leg dermatitis. Therefore, according to our patch test data, PG seems to exhibit very low sensitization potential, and the risk for sensitization to PG on uncompromised skin seems to be very low.
Similar articles
-
Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).Br J Dermatol. 2005 Apr;152(4):709-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06465.x. Br J Dermatol. 2005. PMID: 15840103
-
Patch Testing to Propylene Glycol: The Mayo Clinic Experience.Dermatitis. 2018 Jul/Aug;29(4):200-205. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000393. Dermatitis. 2018. PMID: 29923851
-
Skin sensitizing properties of the ethanolamines mono-, di-, and triethanolamine. Data analysis of a multicentre surveillance network (IVDK) and review of the literature.Contact Dermatitis. 2009 May;60(5):243-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01506.x. Contact Dermatitis. 2009. PMID: 19397616 Review.
-
Relationship of occupation to contact dermatitis: evaluation in patients tested from 1998 to 2000.Am J Contact Dermat. 2002 Dec;13(4):170-6. doi: 10.1053/ajcd.2002.36635. Am J Contact Dermat. 2002. PMID: 12478531
-
[Irritant contact dermatitis. Part I. Epidemiology, etiopathogenesis and clinical manifestation].Med Pr. 2008;59(5):409-19. Med Pr. 2008. PMID: 19227886 Review. Polish.
Cited by
-
Contact dermatitis: An important consideration in leg ulcers.Int J Womens Dermatol. 2020 Dec 30;7(3):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2020.12.010. eCollection 2021 Jun. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2020. PMID: 34222587 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Common Allergens Identified Based on Patch Test Results in Patients with Suspected Contact Dermatitis of the Scalp.Skin Appendage Disord. 2017 Mar;3(1):7-14. doi: 10.1159/000453530. Epub 2016 Dec 17. Skin Appendage Disord. 2017. PMID: 28611994 Free PMC article.
-
Toothpaste allergy diagnosis and management.J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010 May;3(5):42-7. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010. PMID: 20725569 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Allergens Responsible for Contact Allergy in Children From 2010 to 2024: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Contact Dermatitis. 2025 May;92(5):327-343. doi: 10.1111/cod.14753. Epub 2025 Jan 19. Contact Dermatitis. 2025. PMID: 39827476 Free PMC article.
-
Follicular contact dermatitis revisited: A review emphasizing neomycin-associated follicular contact dermatitis.World J Clin Cases. 2014 Dec 16;2(12):815-21. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i12.815. World J Clin Cases. 2014. PMID: 25516854 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources