Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2005 Nov 18;123(4):545-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.003.

Slugging it out: fine tuning the p53-PUMA death connection

Affiliations
Comment

Slugging it out: fine tuning the p53-PUMA death connection

Jack T Zilfou et al. Cell. .

Abstract

In response to DNA damage, the tumor suppressor p53 elicits a complex cellular response. In this issue of Cell, Wu et al. (2005) show that the transcription factor SLUG is induced by p53 and protects hematopoietic progenitor cells from apoptosis triggered by DNA damage. SLUG exerts this protective role by repressing Puma, a proapoptotic target of p53. PUMA is also a key coordinator of apoptosis mediated by both nuclear and cytoplasmic functions of p53 (Chi-puk et al., 2005).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Role of PUMA and SLUG in Modulating Apoptosis Mediated by p53 Once activated by DNA damage, p53 induces various target genes, including Puma (which encodes a proapoptotic BH3-only protein) and Slug (which encodes a transcription factor that represses Puma transcription). In most cells, the amount of SLUG may not be sufficient to repress Puma and prevent apoptosis. Importantly, in hematopoietic progenitor cells, the endogenous amount of SLUG protein is sufficient to repress Puma and limit apoptosis induced by DNA damage. Also shown is the role of PUMA and p53 in coordinating cell death in the cytoplasm. Here, PUMA binds Bcl-xL and displaces p53, thereby allowing p53 to directly activate Bax and induce permeabilization of mitochondria and cell death.

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aggarwal BB. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003;3:745–756. - PubMed
    1. Chipuk JE, Bouchier-Hayes L, Kuwana T, Newmeyer DD, Green DR. Science. 2005;309:1732–1735. - PubMed
    1. Fang L, Li G, Liu G, Lee SW, Aaronson SA. EMBO J. 2001;20:1931–1939. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Febeyre G, Lowe SW. Nature. 2002;415:26–27. - PubMed
    1. Ikushima S, Inukai T, Inaba T, Nimer SD, Cleveland JL, Look AT. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:2609–2614. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms