Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts
- PMID: 16286210
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.017
Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts
Abstract
Introduction: In 1999, after 3 years of field testing, the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) implemented a grading system for posttreatment orthodontic models and panoramic radiographs, to make the phase III examination both fair and objective. In the ABO's objective grading system, 7 occlusal criteria (tooth alignment, vertical positioning of marginal ridges, buccolingual inclination of posterior teeth, occlusal relationship, occlusal contacts, overjet, and interproximal contacts) are measured on plaster models to assess a patient's final occlusion. To date, no study has evaluated the ABO grading system for use on digital models. The purpose of this study was to determine whether digital models can be used with reasonable accuracy and reliability for assessing patients' final occlusions.
Methods: Plaster and digital (OrthoCAD, Cadent Inc, Carlstadt, NJ) posttreatment models of 24 patients were gathered from the postgraduate orthodontic clinic at Columbia University School of Dental and Oral Surgery. The plaster models were scored by using the ABO measuring gauge and the 7 criteria of the ABO grading system. A second analysis was done on the digital models. To determine interexaminer error, a fourth-year dental student at Columbia University served as a second examiner and repeated all the analyses.
Results: The means of the total score and those for marginal ridges, occlusal contacts, occlusal relationships, overjet, and interproximal contacts were not significantly different between plaster and digital models. However, the means for alignment and buccolingual inclination were significantly different. In addition, the scorings of 2 examiners differed for the 2 methods.
Conclusions: This finding suggests that alignment and buccolingual inclination should be reevaluated with both methods, and adequate calibration of the examiners is essential to achieve repeatability in both methods. Digital models might be acceptable for use in the ABO model examination.
Similar articles
-
Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jan;131(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.042. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17208106
-
Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Feb;133(2):283-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.035. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008. PMID: 18249296
-
Long-term posttreatment changes measured by the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Apr;127(4):444-50; quiz 516. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.029. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005. PMID: 15821689
-
The excellence challenge in orthodontics: clinical use of an objective grading system for orthodontic cases.Prog Orthod. 2009;10(2):4-15. Prog Orthod. 2009. PMID: 20545087
-
Assessment of the reliability of measurements taken on digital orthodontic models obtained from scans of plaster models in laboratory scanners. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Orthod. 2022 Sep 19;44(5):522-529. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac005. Eur J Orthod. 2022. PMID: 35363303
Cited by
-
Reliability of a digital system for models measurements in BBO grading: A pilot study.Dental Press J Orthod. 2022 Feb 28;27(1):e2219388. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.27.1.e2219388.oar. eCollection 2022. Dental Press J Orthod. 2022. PMID: 35239942 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of dental morphometrics during the orthodontic treatment.Biomed Eng Online. 2014 Jun 3;13:68. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-68. Biomed Eng Online. 2014. PMID: 24893983 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparative Evaluation of Mixed Dentition Analysis on Reliability of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Image Compared to Plaster Model.J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Jul-Aug;7(4):214-217. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_182_17. Epub 2017 Jul 31. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017. PMID: 28852639 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little's Index.Angle Orthod. 2010 May;80(3):435-9. doi: 10.2319/083109-491.1. Angle Orthod. 2010. PMID: 20050733 Free PMC article.
-
Linear measurements using virtual study models.Angle Orthod. 2012 Nov;82(6):1098-106. doi: 10.2319/110311-681.1. Epub 2012 Apr 24. Angle Orthod. 2012. PMID: 22530811 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical