High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 16287954
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.19.2437
High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study: a randomized controlled trial
Erratum in
- JAMA. 2005 Dec 28;294(24):3092
Abstract
Context: Evidence suggests that more intensive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) than is commonly applied clinically will provide further benefit in stable coronary artery disease.
Objective: To compare the effects of 2 strategies of lipid lowering on the risk of cardiovascular disease among patients with a previous myocardial infarction (MI).
Design, setting, and participants: The IDEAL study, a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point evaluation trial conducted at 190 ambulatory cardiology care and specialist practices in northern Europe between March 1999 and March 2005 with a median follow-up of 4.8 years, which enrolled 8888 patients aged 80 years or younger with a history of acute MI.
Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive a high dose of atorvastatin (80 mg/d; n = 4439), or usual-dose simvastatin (20 mg/d; n = 4449).
Main outcome measure: Occurrence of a major coronary event, defined as coronary death, confirmed nonfatal acute MI, or cardiac arrest with resuscitation.
Results: During treatment, mean LDL-C levels were 104 (SE, 0.3) mg/dL in the simvastatin group and 81 (SE, 0.3) mg/dL in the atorvastatin group. A major coronary event occurred in 463 simvastatin patients (10.4%) and in 411 atorvastatin patients (9.3%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.01; P = .07). Nonfatal acute MI occurred in 321 (7.2%) and 267 (6.0%) in the 2 groups (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98; P = .02), but no differences were seen in the 2 other components of the primary end point. Major cardiovascular events occurred in 608 and 533 in the 2 groups, respectively (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; P = .02). Occurrence of any coronary event was reported in 1059 simvastatin and 898 atorvastatin patients (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91; P<.001). Noncardiovascular death occurred in 156 (3.5%) and 143 (3.2%) in the 2 groups (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.73-1.15; P = .47). Death from any cause occurred in 374 (8.4%) in the simvastatin group and 366 (8.2%) in the atorvastatin group (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.85-1.13; P = .81). Patients in the atorvastatin group had higher rates of drug discontinuation due to nonserious adverse events; transaminase elevation resulted in 43 (1.0%) vs 5 (0.1%) withdrawals (P<.001). Serious myopathy and rhabdomyolysis were rare in both groups.
Conclusions: In this study of patients with previous MI, intensive lowering of LDL-C did not result in a significant reduction in the primary outcome of major coronary events, but did reduce the risk of other composite secondary end points and nonfatal acute MI. There were no differences in cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. Patients with MI may benefit from intensive lowering of LDL-C without an increase in noncardiovascular mortality or other serious adverse reactions.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00159835.
Republished in
-
[High-dose atorvastatin or normal-dose simvastatin in treatment of patients with coronary heart disease (IDEAL trial)--secondary publication].Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 May 1;168(18):1769-71. Ugeskr Laeger. 2006. PMID: 16729930 Danish.
Comment in
-
The IDEAL cholesterol: lower is better.JAMA. 2005 Nov 16;294(19):2492-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.19.2492. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 16287961 No abstract available.
-
Intensive lipid lowering may not reduce major coronary events in people with previous myocardial infarction.Evid Based Cardiovasc Med. 2006 Mar;10(1):61-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ebcm.2006.01.027. Epub 2006 Mar 6. Evid Based Cardiovasc Med. 2006. PMID: 16530693 No abstract available.
-
High-dose statins and the IDEAL study.JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2476-7; author reply 2478-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.21.2476-c. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16757712 No abstract available.
-
High-dose statins and the IDEAL study.JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2476; author reply 2478-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.21.2476-b. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16757713 No abstract available.
-
High-dose statins and the IDEAL study.JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2476; author reply 2478-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.21.2476-a. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16757714 No abstract available.
-
High-dose statins and the IDEAL study.JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2477-8; author reply 2478-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.21.2477-b. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16757715 No abstract available.
-
High-dose statins and the IDEAL study.JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2477; author reply 2478-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.21.2477-a. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16757716 No abstract available.
-
High-dose atorvastatin versus usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction.Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2007 Jan;9(1):5-6. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2007. PMID: 17169238 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
