Comparative efficacy of Rubini, Jeryl-Lynn and Urabe mumps vaccine in an Asian population
- PMID: 16291282
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2004.10.001
Comparative efficacy of Rubini, Jeryl-Lynn and Urabe mumps vaccine in an Asian population
Abstract
Objective: The comparative efficacy of the three mumps vaccine strains (Jeryl-Lynn, Urabe and Rubini) was conducted in an Asian population from data arising from an epidemiological investigation of seven institutional outbreaks of mumps in Singapore.
Methods: Demographic information (gender, age, ethnic group), clinical presentation and vaccination history (date and place of mumps vaccination, type of mumps vaccine received) of all children who attended the six childcare centres and one primary school where outbreaks of 20 or more cases of mumps occurred in 1999 were collected. The attack rate of the unvaccinated group and the attack rates of the vaccine groups (for each vaccine strain) were determined and the vaccine efficacy of the three vaccines calculated.
Results: The vaccine efficacy of the Jeryl-Lynn strain, Urabe strain and Rubini strain mumps vaccine were 80.7, 54.4 and -55.3%, respectively.
Conclusion: Rubini strain mumps vaccine conferred no protection and has since been deregistered in Singapore.
Similar articles
-
[Estimation of the efficacy of three strains of mumps vaccines during an epidemic of mumps in the Geneva canton (Switzerland)].Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1998 Mar;46(2):100-7. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1998. PMID: 9592852 French.
-
Antibody induced by immunization with the Jeryl Lynn mumps vaccine strain effectively neutralizes a heterologous wild-type mumps virus associated with a large outbreak.J Infect Dis. 2008 Aug 15;198(4):508-15. doi: 10.1086/590115. J Infect Dis. 2008. PMID: 18558869
-
[Comparison of the efficacy of various strains of mumps vaccine: a school survey].Soz Praventivmed. 1996;41(6):341-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01324283. Soz Praventivmed. 1996. PMID: 9027138 French.
-
Mumps vaccine virus strains and aseptic meningitis.Vaccine. 2006 Nov 30;24(49-50):7037-45. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.06.049. Epub 2006 Jul 5. Vaccine. 2006. PMID: 16884835 Review.
-
[Wide-spread inflammation of the parotid glands (mumps): an underestimated disease. II. Development, use, efficacy and safety of mumps vaccines].Przegl Epidemiol. 1998;52(4):401-12. Przegl Epidemiol. 1998. PMID: 10321084 Review. Polish.
Cited by
-
Mumps: an Update on Outbreaks, Vaccine Efficacy, and Genomic Diversity.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020 Feb 26;33(2):e00151-19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00151-19. Print 2020 Mar 18. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020. PMID: 32102901 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mumps Vaccines: Current Challenges and Future Prospects.Front Microbiol. 2020 Aug 20;11:1999. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01999. eCollection 2020. Front Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32973721 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mumps Outbreaks in Vaccinated Populations-Is It Time to Re-assess the Clinical Efficacy of Vaccines?Front Immunol. 2020 Sep 18;11:2089. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02089. eCollection 2020. Front Immunol. 2020. PMID: 33072071 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD004407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004407.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 20;4:CD004407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004407.pub4. PMID: 22336803 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Safety and immunogenicity of a live attenuated mumps vaccine: a phase I clinical trial.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(5):1382-90. doi: 10.4161/hv.28334. Epub 2014 Mar 10. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014. PMID: 24614759 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical