Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Nov 15;19(22):2715-26.
doi: 10.1101/gad.340905.

Homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining repair pathways regulate fragile site stability

Affiliations

Homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining repair pathways regulate fragile site stability

Michal Schwartz et al. Genes Dev. .

Abstract

Common fragile sites are specific loci that form gaps and constrictions on metaphase chromosomes exposed to replication stress, which slows DNA replication. These sites have a role in chromosomal rearrangements in tumors; however, the molecular mechanism of their expression is unclear. Here we show that replication stress leads to focus formation of Rad51 and phosphorylated DNA-PKcs, key components of the homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways, respectively. Down-regulation of Rad51, DNA-PKcs, or Ligase IV, an additional component of the NHEJ repair pathway, leads to a significant increase in fragile site expression under replication stress. Replication stress also results in focus formation of the DSB markers, MDC1 and gammaH2AX. These foci colocalized with those of Rad51 and phospho-DNA-PKcs. Furthermore, gammaH2AX and phospho-DNA-PKcs foci were localized at expressed fragile sites on metaphase chromosomes. These findings suggest that DSBs are formed at common fragile sites as a result of replication perturbation. The repair of these breaks by both HR and NHEJ pathways is essential for chromosomal stability at these sites.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Rad51 forms foci following treatment with 0.4 μM aphidicolin. (A) HeLa cells were treated with 0.4 μM aphidicolin for 24 h, fixed, and stained with anti-Rad51 antibodies (α-Rad51). Untreated cells were analyzed as control. (B) Number of Rad51 nuclear foci in cells treated with 0.4 μM aphidicolin and in untreated cells. The data presented are based on at least two independent samples.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
DNA-PKcs forms foci following aphidicolin treatment. (A) HeLa cells were treated with the indicated concentration of aphidicolin for 24 h, fixed, and stained with antibodies against the DNA-PKcs, phosphorylated on Thr2609 (α-pDNA-PKcs). Untreated cells were analyzed as control. (B) Number of phospho-DNA-PKcs nuclear foci in cells treated with 0.4 μM aphidicolin and in untreated cells. (C) Number of phospho-DNA-PKcs nuclear foci in cells treated with the indicated aphidicolin concentration. Note that the categories are different from those in B to allow comparison with the high number of foci obtained with 6 μM aphidicolin. (D) Number of gaps and constrictions per metaphase in HeLa cells treated for 24 h with the indicated aphidicolin concentration. (E) HeLa cells were treated with 0.4 μM aphidicolin for 24 h, fixed, and costained with α-pDNA-PKcs and α-Rad51. The data presented are based on at least two independent samples.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Rad51 down-regulation by RNAi leads to increased common fragile site expression. (A) Western blot probed with α-RAD51 in MCF7 cells transfected with pSUPER encoding siRNA directed against Rad51 (pS-Rad51). Transfection with the pSUPER plasmid (pS) was analyzed as control. Reduction in protein level was 90%. (B) Number of gaps and constrictions per metaphase in MCF7 cells transfected with pS-Rad51 with or without treatment with 0.4 μM aphidicolin for 24 h. Transfection with pS was analyzed as control. (C) Example of a metaphase from MCF7 cells transfected with pS-Rad51 showing a high number of gaps and constrictions (n = 15). The box in the bottom right is a magnification of the area marked in the picture. Arrows mark gaps and constrictions. (D) Frequency of fragile site (FS) FRA3B and FRA16D expression with or without 0.4 μM aphidicolin treatment for 24 h in MCF7 cells transfected with pS-Rad51or pS. Error bars indicate the standard error. The data presented are based on at least two independent samples.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
DNA-PKcs down-regulation by RNAi leads to increased common fragile site expression. (A) Western blot probed with α-DNA-PKcs in MCF7 and HeLa cells transfected with pSUPER encoding siRNA against DNA-PKcs (pS-D-PK). Transfection with the pSUPER plasmid (pS) was analyzed as control. Reduction in protein level was 85% and 65% for MCF7 and HeLa cells, respectively. (B) Number of gaps and constrictions per metaphase in MCF7 cells transfected with pS-D-PK with or without treatment with 0.4 μM aphidicolin for 24 h. Transfection with the pS plasmid was analyzed as control. (C) Number of gaps and constrictions per metaphase in HeLa cells transfected with pS-D-PK with or without treatment with 0.4 μM aphidicolin for 24 h. Transfection with the pS was analyzed as control. (D) Example of a metaphase from MCF7 cells transfected with pS-D-PK showing a high number of gaps and constrictions (n = 28). The box in the top right is a magnification of the area marked in the picture. Arrows mark gaps or constrictions. (E) Frequency of fragile site (FS) FRA3B and FRA16D expression following treatment with 0.4 μM aphidicolin for 24 h in MCF7 cells transfected with pS-D-PK. Transfection with the pS was used as control. (F) The same experiment as in E, performed in HeLa cells. Error bars indicate the standard error. The data presented are based on at least two independent samples.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Ligase IV down-regulation by RNAi leads to increased common fragile site expression. (A) Western blot probed with α-Ligase IV in MCF7 cells transfected with pSUPER encoding siRNA directed against Ligase IV (pS-LigIV). Transfection with the pSUPER plasmid (pS) was analyzed as control. Reduction in protein level was 90%. (B) Number of gaps and constrictions per metaphase in MCF7 cells transfected with pS-LigIV with or without treatment with 0.4 μM aphidicolin for 24 h. Transfection with pS was analyzed as control. (C) Example of a metaphase from MCF7 cells transfected with pS-LigIV showing a high number of gaps and constrictions (n = 18). The box in the top left is a magnification of the area marked in the picture. Arrows mark gaps and constrictions. (D) Frequency of fragile site (FS) FRA3B and FRA16D expression following treatment with 0.4 μM aphidicolin for 24 h in MCF7 cells transfected with pS-LigIV or pS. Error bars indicate the standard error. The data presented are based on at least two independent samples.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
γH2AX forms foci following aphidicolin treatment. (A) HeLa cells were treated with the indicated aphidicolin concentrations for 24 h, fixed, and stained with anti-γH2AX antibodies (α-γH2AX). Untreated cells were analyzed as control. (B) Number of γH2AX nuclear foci in cells treated with 0.4 μM aphidicolin and in untreated cells. (C) Number of γH2AX nuclear foci in cells treated with the indicated aphidicolin concentration. Note that the categories are different from those in B to allow comparison with the high number of foci obtained with 6 μM aphidicolin. (D) HeLa cells were treated with 0.4 μM aphidicolin for 24 h, fixed, and costained with α-γH2AX and α-pDNA-PKcs. (E) HeLa cells were treated with 0.4 μM aphidicolin for 24 h, fixed, and costained with α-γH2AX and α-Rad51. The data presented are based on at least two independent samples.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
MDC1 forms foci following treatment with 0.4 μM aphidicolin. (A) HeLa cells were treated with 0.4 μM aphidicolin for 24 h, fixed, and stained with anti-MDC1 antibodies (α-MDC1). Untreated cells were analyzed as control. (B) Number of MDC1 nuclear foci in cells treated with 0.4 μM aphidicolin and in untreated cells. The data presented are based on at least two independent samples.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
γH2AX and phospho-DNA-PKcs foci localize to expressed fragile sites at metaphase. Chromosomes from HeLa cells treated with 0.4 μM aphidicolin for 24 h were stained with anti-γH2AX or anti-phospho-DNA-PKcs and hybridized with a probe from the FRA3B region. (A) DAPI staining of chromosome 3 expressing FRA3B (arrow). (B) The same chromosome showing a γH2AX immunofluorescent signal (red) and a FISH signal of a probe from the FRA3B region (green). (C) DAPI staining of chromosome 3 expressing FRA3B (arrow). (D) The same chromosome showing a phospho-DNA-PKcs immunofluorescent signal (red) and a FISH signal of a probe from the FRA3B region (green). (E) Quantitation of the localization of γH2AX and phospho-DNA-PKcs foci to the FRA3B region. Error bars indicate the standard error. The data presented are based on at least two independent samples.

References

    1. Abraham R.T. 2001. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes & Dev. 15: 2177–2196. - PubMed
    1. Agami R. and Bernards, R. 2000. Distinct initiation and maintenance mechanisms cooperate to induce G1 cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. Cell 102: 55–66. - PubMed
    1. Allen C., Kurimasa, A., Brenneman, M.A., Chen, D.J., and Nickoloff, J.A. 2002. DNA-dependent protein kinase suppresses double-strand break-induced and spontaneous homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 3758–3763. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arlt M.F., Miller, D.E., Beer, D.G., and Glover, T.W. 2002. Molecular characterization of FRAXB and comparative common fragile site instability in cancer cells. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 33: 82–92. - PubMed
    1. Arlt M.F., Casper, A.M., and Glover, T.W. 2003. Common fragile sites. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 100: 92–100. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms