Progression of approximal caries in relation to iatrogenic preparation damage
- PMID: 1629452
- DOI: 10.1177/00220345920710070401
Progression of approximal caries in relation to iatrogenic preparation damage
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of iatrogenic preparation damage on the need for operative caries treatment of approximal surfaces, adjacent to Class II amalgam restorations. The material was collected by 77 dentists from the Public Dental Child Health Service in Denmark. It consisted of die-stone models of 187 first-time Class II preparations, adjacent to 190 unfilled approximal surfaces of 58 primary and 132 permanent teeth. The cavity preparations were performed in children between 4 and 17 years of age. They were all filled with amalgam. Information about operative treatment and exfoliation or extraction of the preparation teeth and the adjacent teeth during the following seven years was obtained from the patients' records. Stereomicroscopic examination of the models revealed preparation damage on 64% of the unfilled approximal surfaces in primary teeth and on 69% of the corresponding test surfaces in permanent teeth. During the observation period, operative treatment was performed on 10% of the undamaged test surfaces in primary teeth and on 35% of the damaged ones (p less than 0.05). The corresponding figures for test surfaces in permanent teeth were 6% and 15% (p less than 0.05). It is concluded that iatrogenic preparation damage is a frequent side-effect of operative intervention with approximal caries lesions, and represents a dental health problem, since the damage increases caries progression and the perceived need for restorative therapy of the adjacent teeth.
Similar articles
-
Iatrogenic damage to the adjacent surfaces of primary molars, in three different ways of cavity preparation.Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006 Mar;7(1):6-10. doi: 10.1007/BF03320808. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006. PMID: 17140521 Clinical Trial.
-
Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.J Dent Res. 1997 Jul;76(7):1387-96. doi: 10.1177/00220345970760070901. J Dent Res. 1997. PMID: 9207772 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition.Swed Dent J Suppl. 1993;96:1-47. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1993. PMID: 8310420
-
Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer.Eur J Oral Sci. 2004 Apr;112(2):188-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00117.x. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004. PMID: 15056118 Clinical Trial.
-
Direct access to equivocal approximal carious lesions.Quintessence Int. 1996 Sep;27(9):607-17. Quintessence Int. 1996. PMID: 9180418 Review.
Cited by
-
Tunnel or saucer-shaped restorations: a survival analysis.Clin Oral Investig. 2005 Dec;9(4):233-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-005-0011-6. Epub 2005 Aug 23. Clin Oral Investig. 2005. PMID: 16133496 Clinical Trial.
-
Iatrogenic damage to the adjacent surfaces of primary molars, in three different ways of cavity preparation.Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006 Mar;7(1):6-10. doi: 10.1007/BF03320808. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006. PMID: 17140521 Clinical Trial.
-
Assessment of Proximal Protection Usage by Dental Students During Class II Cavity Preparations: An In Vivo Pilot Study.Cureus. 2023 Oct 23;15(10):e47550. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47550. eCollection 2023 Oct. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38021875 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors and development patterns of approximal caries: a retrospective cross-sectional radiographic assessment.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05844-3. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40170016 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2013 Sep 3;14:278. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-278. Trials. 2013. PMID: 24004961 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical