Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. I
- PMID: 1629480
- DOI: 10.1121/1.402950
Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. I
Abstract
The effect of reduced spectral contrast on the speech-reception threshold (SRT) for sentences in noise and on phoneme identification, was investigated with 16 normal-hearing subjects. Signal processing was performed by smoothing the envelope of the squared short-time fast Fourier transform (FFT) by convolving it with a Gaussian-shaped filter, and overlapping additions to reconstruct a continuous signal. Spectral energy in the frequency region from 100 to 8000 Hz was smeared over bandwidths of 1/8, 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 1, 2, and 4 oct for the SRT experiment. Vowel and consonant identification was studied for smearing bandwidths of 1/8, 1/2, and 2 oct. Results showed the SRT in noise to increase as the spectral energy was smeared over bandwidths exceeding the ear's critical bandwidth. Vowel identification suffered more from this type of processing than consonant identification. Vowels were primarily confused with the back vowels /c,u/, and consonants were confused where place of articulation is concerned.
Similar articles
-
Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II.J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Mar;93(3):1547-52. doi: 10.1121/1.406813. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993. PMID: 8473608
-
Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception.J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Feb;95(2):1053-64. doi: 10.1121/1.408467. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994. PMID: 8132899
-
Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognition.J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Sep;100(3):1807-18. doi: 10.1121/1.416000. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996. PMID: 8817914
-
Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception.J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 May;95(5 Pt 1):2670-80. doi: 10.1121/1.409836. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994. PMID: 8207140
-
Reliability of the TIP and DIP speech-hearing tests for children.J Commun Disord. 1975 Dec;8(4):325-33. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(75)90033-7. J Commun Disord. 1975. PMID: 803155 Review.
Cited by
-
Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses.J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Jul;112(1):247-58. doi: 10.1121/1.1487843. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002. PMID: 12141350 Free PMC article.
-
Speech Recognition in Noise by Children with and without Dyslexia: How is it Related to Reading?Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Jun;77:98-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 May 1. Res Dev Disabil. 2018. PMID: 29724639 Free PMC article.
-
The modulation transfer function for speech intelligibility.PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Mar;5(3):e1000302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000302. Epub 2009 Mar 6. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009. PMID: 19266016 Free PMC article.
-
The Influence of Cochlear Mechanical Dysfunction, Temporal Processing Deficits, and Age on the Intelligibility of Audible Speech in Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.Trends Hear. 2016 Sep 7;20:2331216516641055. doi: 10.1177/2331216516641055. Trends Hear. 2016. PMID: 27604779 Free PMC article.
-
Simulating the effect of spread of excitation in cochlear implants.Hear Res. 2008 Jul;241(1-2):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.04.012. Epub 2008 May 10. Hear Res. 2008. PMID: 18556160 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources