Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(2):96-107.
doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-20.2.96.

A systematic review of mammography educational interventions for low-income women

Affiliations

A systematic review of mammography educational interventions for low-income women

Tatiana M Bailey et al. Am J Health Promot. 2005 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: We conducted a systematic review to examine the effectiveness of educational interventions in increasing mammography screening among low-income women.

Data sources: Bibliographic databases, including MEDLINE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the ISI Web of Science, were searched for relevant articles.

Study inclusion and exclusion criteria: Randomized, community-based trials targeting low-income women and published between January 1980 and March 2003 were included.

Data extraction: The search yielded 242 studies; 24 met all inclusion criteria.

Data synthesis: Three studies used mammography vans, three used low-cost vouchers or provided free mammograms, three used home visits, one used community education alone, one provided referrals, five incorporated multiple intervention strategies, two used phone calls, one used videos and print material, and five used primarily print material.

Results: Of nine studies that reduced barriers to care via mammography vans, cost vouchers, or home visits, eight showed statistically significant increases in mammography screening. Seven of the eight studies that used peer educators had significant increases in screening, as did four of the five studies that used multiple (intervention) components.

Conclusions: Interventions that used peer educators, incorporated multiple intervention strategies, or provided easy access via vans, cost vouchers, or home visits were effective in increasing screenings. Mailed letter or telephone reminders were not effective in trials involving low-income women, which is contrary to findings from middle/upper-income studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Health Resources and Services Administration. Healthy People 2010, Access to Quality Health Services. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2002.
    1. Skinner CS, Arfken L, Waterman B. Outcomes of the learn, share & live breast cancer education program for older urban women. Am J Public Health. 2000;8:1229–1234. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Slater JS, Ha CN, Malone ME, et al. A randomized community trial to increase mammography utilization among low-income women living in public housing. Prev Med. 1998;27:862–870. - PubMed
    1. Skaer TL, Robinson LM, Sclar DA, et al. Financial incentive and the use of mammography among Hispanic migrants to the United States. Health Care Women Int. 1996;17:281–291. - PubMed
    1. Fletcher SW, Harris RP, González JJ, et al. Increasing mammography utilization: a controlled study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:112–120. - PubMed

Publication types