A 6-week double-blind comparison of amlodipine and placebo in patients with stable exertional angina pectoris receiving concomitant beta-blocker therapy
- PMID: 16296710
- DOI: 10.1097/00005344-199117001-00016
A 6-week double-blind comparison of amlodipine and placebo in patients with stable exertional angina pectoris receiving concomitant beta-blocker therapy
Abstract
This study was a multicenter, double-blind comparison of the antianginal efficacy and safety of amlodipine and placebo as adjunctive therapy with constant recommended maintenance doses of beta-blockers. Patients with stable exertional angina pectoris were randomized to placebo or amlodipine at a starting dose of 5 mg once daily. The amlodipine dose was adjusted to 10 mg daily after 2 weeks if angina attacks were not abolished. Antianginal efficacy was assessed throughout the study with angina diaries, investigators' and patients' global evaluations, and with bicycle exercise tests during a placebo run-in period (baseline) and after 2 and 6 weeks of double-blind treatment. On baseline-final analysis, the exercise time to angina onset increased by 13% with amlodipine compared to 6% with placebo (p < 0.05). The total exercise time increased by 11% on amlodipine compared with 2% on placebo, though this difference did not reach statistical significance. Angina attack frequency and nitroglycerin consumption were both reduced by adding amlodipine to beta-blocker treatment. Amlodipine in combination with beta-blocker therapy was well tolerated, with a low incidence of side effects and laboratory test abnormalities. The study showed clearly that addition of amlodipine to beta-blocker therapy in patients with stable angina pectoris was well tolerated and gave improved antianginal efficacy.
Similar articles
-
An 8-week double-blind study of amlodipine and diltiazem in patients with stable exertional angina pectoris.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17 Suppl 1:S53-6. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199117001-00017. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991. PMID: 16296711 Clinical Trial.
-
A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel dose-response study of amlodipine in stable exertional angina pectoris.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17 Suppl 1:S46-9. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199117001-00015. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991. PMID: 16296709 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of ranolazine with atenolol, amlodipine, or diltiazem on exercise tolerance and angina frequency in patients with severe chronic angina: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2004 Jan 21;291(3):309-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.3.309. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 14734593 Clinical Trial.
-
Usefulness of amlodipine for angina pectoris.Am J Cardiol. 1994 Jan 27;73(3):28A-33A. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90271-2. Am J Cardiol. 1994. PMID: 8310973 Review.
-
A review of amlodipine in myocardial ischaemia.Postgrad Med J. 1991;67 Suppl 5:S48-51. Postgrad Med J. 1991. PMID: 1839440 Review.
Cited by
-
Amlodipine in patients with angina uncontrolled by atenolol. A double blind placebo controlled cross over trial.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;45(2):107-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00315489. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993. PMID: 8223829 Clinical Trial.
-
Electrophysiologic effects of amlodipine vs. diltiazem in patients with coronary artery disease and beta-blocking therapy.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1994 Aug;8(4):653-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00877419. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1994. PMID: 7848900 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical