Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Nov;24(11):1710-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.03.019. Epub 2005 Jun 20.

Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection

Affiliations

Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection

Susan Stewart et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Nov.

Abstract

In 1990, an international grading system for cardiac allograft biopsies was adopted by the International Society for Heart Transplantation. This system has served the heart transplant community well, facilitating communication between transplant centers, especially with regard to patient management and research. In 2004, under the direction of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), a multidisciplinary review of the cardiac biopsy grading system was undertaken to address challenges and inconsistencies in its use and to address recent advances in the knowledge of antibody-mediated rejection. This article summarizes the revised consensus classification for cardiac allograft rejection. In brief, the revised (R) categories of cellular rejection are as follows: Grade 0 R--no rejection (no change from 1990); Grade 1 R--mild rejection (1990 Grades 1A, 1B and 2); Grade 2 R--moderate rejection (1990 Grade 3A); and Grade 3 R--severe rejection (1990 Grades 3B and 4). Because the histologic sub-types of Quilty A and Quilty B have never been shown to have clinical significance, the "A" and "B" designations have been eliminated. Recommendations are also made for the histologic recognition and immunohistologic investigation of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) with the expectation that greater standardization of the assessment of this controversial entity will clarify its clinical significance. Technical considerations in biopsy processing are also addressed. This consensus revision of the Working Formulation was approved by the ISHLT Board of Directors in December 2004.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • The revised ISHLT heart biopsy grading scale.
    Billingham M, Kobashigawa JA. Billingham M, et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Nov;24(11):1709. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.03.018. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005. PMID: 16297769 No abstract available.

LinkOut - more resources