Detection of Her-2/neu oncogene in breast carcinoma by chromogenic in situ hybridization in cytologic specimens
- PMID: 16299744
- DOI: 10.1002/dc.20401
Detection of Her-2/neu oncogene in breast carcinoma by chromogenic in situ hybridization in cytologic specimens
Abstract
Determination of Her-2/neu oncogene amplification is important in the current treatment of breast carcinoma. In addition to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemical stain (HercepTest), chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) has been shown to be a sensitive and specific method to determine the Her-2/neu status of surgical specimens. The effectiveness of CISH in detecting the Her-2/neu oncogene in cytologic specimens has not been well documented. Twenty-five cases of fine needle aspirate smears and touch imprints from infiltrating ductal carcinomas were examined. Both CISH and FISH were performed on each case using a digoxigenin-labeled Her-2 DNA probe for CISH (Zymed) and both Her-2 and chromosome 17 probes for FISH (Vysis). Sixty tumor cells were evaluated in each case. The scoring system and interpretation of CISH were as follows: (1) no amplification (<5 brown dots/nucleus), (2) amplification (>10 brown dots/nucleus), and (3) low-level amplification (5-9 brown dots/nucleus). Of the 25 cases analyzed, 23 (3 amplified and 20 nonamplified) showed similar results for both methods. Two cases were discordant. In these cases, low-level amplification was suggested by CISH but nonamplification by FISH. One of the cases can be explained by polysomy for chromosome 17 by FISH. In conclusion, our preliminary data suggest that CISH is a useful technique to determine Her-2/neu oncogene status in cytologic specimens. In a case of low-level amplification, a CISH chromosome 17 probe should be used, or FISH is recommended for confirmation.
Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc
Similar articles
-
Chromogenic in situ hybridization for the detection of HER-2/neu gene amplification in breast cancer with an emphasis on tumors with borderline and low-level amplification: does it measure up to fluorescence in situ hybridization?Am J Clin Pathol. 2005 Feb;123(2):237-43. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005. PMID: 15842048
-
The effect of chromosome 17 polysomy on HER-2/neu status in breast cancer.J Clin Pathol. 2008 Mar;61(3):317-21. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2007.050336. Epub 2007 Aug 30. J Clin Pathol. 2008. PMID: 17761736
-
Interlaboratory comparison of HER-2 oncogene amplification as detected by chromogenic and fluorescence in situ hybridization.Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Jul 15;10(14):4793-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0428-03. Clin Cancer Res. 2004. PMID: 15269154
-
[HER-2 oncogene amplification assessment in invasive breast cancer by dual-color in situ hybridization (dc-CISH): a comparative study with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)].Ann Pathol. 2011 Dec;31(6):472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annpat.2011.10.013. Epub 2011 Nov 26. Ann Pathol. 2011. PMID: 22172120 Review. French.
-
[HER2 gene amplification assay: is CISH an alternative to FISH?].Ann Pathol. 2003 Dec;23(6):617-22. Ann Pathol. 2003. PMID: 15094603 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Out of the darkness and into the light: bright field in situ hybridisation for delineation of ERBB2 (HER2) status in breast carcinoma.J Clin Pathol. 2010 Mar;63(3):210-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2009.062760. J Clin Pathol. 2010. PMID: 20203220 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Chromogenic in situ hybridization compared with other approaches to evaluate HER2/neu status in breast carcinomas.Braz J Med Biol Res. 2013 Mar;46(3):207-16. doi: 10.1590/1414-431x20132483. Epub 2013 Mar 19. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2013. PMID: 23558859 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Flow cytometry, molecular analysis, and other special techniques (in Serous Fluid Cytopathology).Cytojournal. 2022 Mar 19;19:18. doi: 10.25259/CMAS_02_13_2021. eCollection 2022. Cytojournal. 2022. PMID: 35510118 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous