Screening for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in outpatients with suspected DVT or PE by the sequential use of clinical score: a sensitive quantitative D-dimer test and noninvasive diagnostic tools
- PMID: 16302156
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-922480
Screening for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in outpatients with suspected DVT or PE by the sequential use of clinical score: a sensitive quantitative D-dimer test and noninvasive diagnostic tools
Abstract
The requirement for a safe diagnostic strategy should be based on an overall posttest incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) of less than 1% during 3-month follow-up. The negative predictive value (NPV) during 3 months of follow-up is 98.1 to 99% after a normal venogram, 97 to 98% after a normal compression ultrasonography (CUS), and > 99% after serial CUS testing. Serial CUS testing is safe but 100 CUS must be repeated to find one or two CUS positive for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which is not cost-effective and indicates the need to improve the diagnostic workup of DVT by the use of clinical score assessment and D-dimer testing. The NPV varies from 97.6 to 99.4% for low clinical score followed by a negative SimpiRED test, indicating the need for a first CUS. The NPV is 98.4 to 99.3% for a normal rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) VIDAS D-dimer test result (< 500 ng/mL) irrespective of clinical score. The NPV is more than 99% for a negative CUS followed by either a negative SimpiRED test or an ELISA VIDAS test result of < 1000 ng/mL without the need to repeat a second CUS within 1 week. The sequential use of a sensitive, rapid ELISA D-dimer and clinical score assessment will safely reduce the need for CUS testing by 40 to 60%. Large prospective outcome studies demonstrate that with one negative examination with complete duplex color ultrasonography (CCUS) of the proximal and distal veins of the affected leg with suspected DVT, it is safe to withhold anticoagulant treatment, with a negative predictive value of 99.5%. This may indicates that CCUS is equal to serial CUS or the combined use of clinical score, D-dimer testing, and CUS. Pulmonary angiography is the gold standard for segmental pulmonary embolism (PE) but not for subsegmental PE. A normal perfusion lung scan and a normal rapid ELISA VIDAS D-dimer test safely excludes PE. Helical spiral computed tomography (CT) detects all clinically relevant PE and a large number of alternative diagnoses in symptomatic patients with suspected PE and can replace both the ventilation perfusion scan and pulmonary angiography to safely rule in PE and to rule out PE with an NPV of > 99%. The combination of clinical assessment, a rapid ELISA VIDAS D-dimer, followed by CUS will reduce the need for helical spiral CT by 40 to 50%.
Similar articles
-
Different accuracies of rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent, turbidimetric, and agglutination D-dimer assays for thrombosis exclusion: impact on diagnostic work-ups of outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006 Oct;32(7):678-93. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-951296. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006. PMID: 17024595 Review.
-
A critical appraisal of non-invasive diagnosis and exclusion of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: how many tests do we need?Int Angiol. 2005 Mar;24(1):27-39. Int Angiol. 2005. PMID: 15876996 Review.
-
Non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, anno 2005.Acta Chir Belg. 2005 Feb;105(1):26-34. Acta Chir Belg. 2005. PMID: 15790199 Review.
-
Assessment of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism by the combined use of clinical model and noninvasive diagnostic tests.Semin Thromb Hemost. 2000;26(6):643-56. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-13219. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2000. PMID: 11140801 Review.
-
The rehabilitation of clinical assessment for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.Semin Vasc Med. 2002 Nov;2(4):345-51. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-36764. Semin Vasc Med. 2002. PMID: 16222624 Review.
Cited by
-
Multimodality imaging of the peripheral venous system.Int J Biomed Imaging. 2007;2007:54616. doi: 10.1155/2007/54616. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2007. PMID: 18521181 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of strategies for diagnosing pulmonary embolism among emergency department patients presenting with undifferentiated symptoms.Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;56(4):321-332.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.03.029. Epub 2010 Jun 3. Ann Emerg Med. 2010. PMID: 20605261 Free PMC article.
-
Medical management of patients with brain tumors.J Neurooncol. 2006 Dec;80(3):313-32. doi: 10.1007/s11060-006-9193-2. Epub 2006 Jun 29. J Neurooncol. 2006. PMID: 16807780 Review.
-
Fatal pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients: a large autopsy-based matched case-control study.Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013 May;68(5):679-85. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(05)16. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013. PMID: 23778403 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical