Whose brain is it anyway? The comparative law of post-mortem organ retention
- PMID: 16303735
- DOI: 10.1080/01947640500364739
Whose brain is it anyway? The comparative law of post-mortem organ retention
Similar articles
-
Consent for organ and tissue retention in British law in the light of the Human Tissue Act 2004.Med Law. 2006 Sep;25(3):427-34. Med Law. 2006. PMID: 17078517
-
Summit signals a change in the law on organ retention.BMJ. 2001 Jan 20;322(7279):125. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7279.125. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11159558 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Inquiry finds brains were removed without consent.BMJ. 2003 May 17;326(7398):1051. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1051. BMJ. 2003. PMID: 12750185 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Organ retention for research: the Isaacs Report.Bull Med Ethics. 2003 Jul;(189):18-9. Bull Med Ethics. 2003. PMID: 14983866 No abstract available.
-
[Patients' rights of the deceased and related problems in Hungarian law].Orv Hetil. 2012 Mar 4;153(9):330-8. doi: 10.1556/OH.2012.29316. Orv Hetil. 2012. PMID: 22348848 Review. Hungarian.
Cited by
-
Post mortem examinations in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: challenges and chances.J Neurooncol. 2011 Jan;101(1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0224-7. Epub 2010 May 16. J Neurooncol. 2011. PMID: 20473723
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources