Medicolegal aspects of an unusual uterine perforation with multiload-Cu 375R
- PMID: 16304473
- DOI: 10.1097/01.paf.0000188083.15245.a5
Medicolegal aspects of an unusual uterine perforation with multiload-Cu 375R
Abstract
Perforation of the uterus is one of the most serious complications associated with insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUD). According to recent studies, this lesion occurs in 0.87 per 1000 cases, but statistics generally fluctuate between 0.05 and 13 per 1000 insertions. "Primary" perforations occur at the time of IUD insertion, and "secondary," or delayed, perforations are usually assumed to be caused by reactive uterine contractions. We report an unusual case of uterine perforation, which occurred 9 days after the insertion of a Multiload-Cu 375 IUD. The criteria for differential diagnosis between primary and secondary complications are discussed, particularly from the perspective of medical malpractice cases.
Similar articles
-
Uterine perforation by GyneFix frameless IUD: two case reports.J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2001 Jul;27(3):153-4. doi: 10.1783/147118901101195344. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2001. PMID: 12457496
-
Uterine perforation by copper intrauterine device.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1984 Jun;17(4):257-61. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(84)90068-6. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1984. PMID: 6378687
-
Laparoscopic removal of translocated intrauterine contraceptives devices.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Feb;89(2):163-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04686.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982. PMID: 6461352
-
Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. II. Diagnostic methods, prevention, and management.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981 Aug;36(8):401-17. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198108000-00001. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981. PMID: 6455610 Review.
-
Ileal penetration by a Multiload-Cu 375 intrauterine contraceptive device. A case report with review of the literature.Contraception. 1998 Nov;58(5):295-304. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00116-4. Contraception. 1998. PMID: 9883385 Review.
Cited by
-
An unusual presentation of perforated intrauterine contraceptive device.Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013 Apr;3(2):274-6. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.113678. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013. PMID: 23919205 Free PMC article.
-
Intrauterine contraceptive device embedded in the omentum - case report.Int J Womens Health. 2015 Dec 1;7:945-8. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S83336. eCollection 2015. Int J Womens Health. 2015. PMID: 26664227 Free PMC article.
-
Translocation of an intrauterine contraceptive device: incidental finding in the rectosigmoid colon.Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010;2010:404160. doi: 10.1155/2010/404160. Epub 2010 Jun 9. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010. PMID: 20613996 Free PMC article.
-
Asymptomatic far-migration of an intrauterine device into the abdominal cavity: A rare entity.Can Urol Assoc J. 2012 Jun;6(3):E134-6. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.11100. Can Urol Assoc J. 2012. PMID: 22709887 Free PMC article.
-
Uterine perforation and migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device in a 24-year-old patient seeking care for abdominal pain.J Chiropr Med. 2011 Jun;10(2):126-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2010.11.001. Epub 2011 Apr 5. J Chiropr Med. 2011. PMID: 22014868 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources