Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992;34(3):235-40.
doi: 10.1007/BF00596345.

Radicular avulsion resulting from spinal injury: assessment of diagnostic modalities

Affiliations

Radicular avulsion resulting from spinal injury: assessment of diagnostic modalities

E Volle et al. Neuroradiology. 1992.

Abstract

The diagnostic utility of imaging techniques in injuries to the intramedullary and subarachnoid portions of the brachial plexus, with possibly complete avulsion of one or more nerve roots from the spinal cord and extramedullary meningocoele was compared in 18 patients studied by unenhanced computed tomography (CT), cervical myelography, myelographic CT (MCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Emphasis was placed on the lesions of the subarachnoid roots. CM was the only diagnostic modality to show avulsion of 18 nerve roots and their levels in 8 patients (100% = gold standard), and to verify 2 incomplete avulsions. MCT reliably revealed 8 of 18 (45%) and MRI 1 out of 18 (6%) avulsions. Myelography with MCT showed intact subarachnoid nerve roots in 10 additional patients. MRI and MCT (16 out of 16 = 100%) were superior to myelography (14/16 = 88%) for demonstrating 16 traumatic meningocoeles in 8 patients; follow-up MRI (6-24 months) showed no increase in their size. We recommend a subsequent CT to role out fracture to the spinal column; MRI should provide significant information concerning oedema or haemorrhage in the spinal cord. Myelography with segmental MCT is performed to differentiate pre- from post-ganglionic lesions, data which are essential for deciding whether exploration of the plexus or a motor substitution operation is indicated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ann Radiol (Paris). 1973 Nov-Dec;16(11):715-21 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1968 May;50(2):253-60 - PubMed
    1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1987 Mar-Apr;8(2):361-7 - PubMed
    1. Neuroradiology. 1989;31(5):377-81 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1990 Nov;177(2):590-1 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources